Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital

Impact of caller's degree-of-worry on triage response in out-of-hours telephone consultations: a randomized controlled trial

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review


  1. New clinical guidelines on the spinal stabilisation of adult trauma patients - consensus and evidence based

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Patient experience of spinal immobilisation after trauma

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Availability of suPAR in emergency departments may improve risk stratification: a secondary analysis of the TRIAGE III trial

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Medical dispatchers' perception of visual information in real out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a qualitative interview study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  5. Pre-hospital management of acute stroke patients eligible for thrombolysis - an evaluation of ambulance on-scene time

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: Telephone triage entails assessment of urgency and direction of flow in out-of-hours (OOH) services, while visual cues are inherently lacking. Triage tools are recommended but current tools fail to provide systematic assessment of the caller's perspective. Research demonstrated that callers can scale their degree-of-worry (DOW) in a telephone contact with OOH services, but its impact on triage response is undetermined. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between call-handlers' awareness of the caller's DOW and the telephone triage response.

METHODS: A randomized controlled trial at a Danish OOH service using telephone triage with quantitative analyses and qualitative process evaluation. Prior to contact with a call-handler, callers were asked to rate their DOW on a five-point scale. Calls were randomized to show or not show DOW on the call-handlers' screens. Triage response (telephone consultation or face-to-face consultation) was analysed using Chi-square tests. Process evaluation incorporated a quantitative and qualitative assessment of intervention implementation and fidelity.

RESULTS: Of 11,413 calls, 5705 were allocated to the intervention and 5708 to the control group. No difference in number of face-to-face consultations was detected between the two groups (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.14, p = 0.17). The process evaluation showed that call-handlers did not use the DOW systematically and were reluctant to use DOW.

CONCLUSION: Awareness of DOW did not affect the triage response, but this finding could reflect a weak implementation strategy. Future studies should emphasise the implementation strategy to determine the effect of DOW on triage response.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration number, NCT02979457 .

TidsskriftScandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)44
StatusUdgivet - 11 apr. 2019

ID: 56982858