Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Impact of beam angle choice on pencil beam scanning breath-hold proton therapy for lung lesions

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. The power of empirical data; lessons from the clinical registry initiatives in Scandinavian cancer care

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Predictive pharmacogenetic biomarkers for breast cancer recurrence prevention by simvastatin

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Biological optimization for mediastinal lymphoma radiotherapy - a preliminary study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. eHealth-mind the gap

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Multimodal soft tissue markers for bridging high-resolution diagnostic imaging with therapeutic intervention

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Early Appearance of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Associated Pulmonary Infiltrates During Daily Radiotherapy Imaging for Lung Cancer

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. The Feasibility of Implementing Deep Inspiration Breath-Hold for Pediatric Radiation Therapy

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

INTRODUCTION: The breath-hold technique inter alia has been suggested to mitigate the detrimental effect of motion on pencil beam scanned (PBS) proton therapy dose distributions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the robustness of incident proton beam angles to day-to-day anatomical variations in breath-hold.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single field PBS plans at five degrees increments in the transversal plane were made and water-equivalent path lengths (WEPLs) were derived on the planning breath-hold CT (BHCT) for 30 patients diagnosed with locally-advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), early stage NSCLC or lung metastasis. Our treatment planning system was subsequently used to recalculate the plans and derive WEPL on a BHCT scan acquired at the end of the treatment. Changes to the V95%, D95 and mean target dose were evaluated.

RESULTS: The difference in WEPL as a function of the beam angle was highly patient specific, with a median of 3.3 mm (range: 0.0-41.1 mm). Slightly larger WEPL differences were located around the lateral or lateral anterior/posterior beam angles. Linear models revealed that changes in dose were associated to the changes in WEPL and the tumor baseline shift (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS: WEPL changes and tumor baseline shift can serve as reasonable surrogates for dosimetric uncertainty of the target coverage and are well-suited for routine evaluation of plan robustness. The two lateral beam angles are not recommended to use for PBS proton therapy of lung cancer patients treated in breath-hold, due to the poor robustness for several of the patients evaluated.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftActa oncologica
Vol/bind56
Udgave nummer6
Sider (fra-til)853-859
Antal sider7
ISSN0284-186X
DOI
StatusUdgivet - jun. 2017

ID: 52024987