Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Immediate Sequential Bilateral Cataract Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Retinal Vessel Diameter Changes in Relation to Dark Adaptation and Acute Hyperglycemia

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Proteomic Analysis of the Vitreous following Experimental Retinal Detachment in Rabbits

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Five-Year Change in Choroidal Thickness in Relation to Body Development and Axial Eye Elongation: The CCC2000 Eye Study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Social skills training for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children aged 5 to 18 years

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  3. Visual acuity and amblyopia prevalence in 11- to 12-year-old Danish children from the Copenhagen Child Cohort 2000

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. An ontological foundation for ocular phenotypes and rare eye diseases

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftLetterForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

The aim of the present systematic review was to examine the benefits and harms associated with immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery (ISBCS) with specific emphasis on the rate of complications, postoperative anisometropia, and subjective visual function in order to formulate evidence-based national Danish guidelines for cataract surgery. A systematic literature review in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane central databases identified three randomized controlled trials that compared outcome in patients randomized to ISBCS or bilateral cataract surgery on two different dates. Meta-analyses were performed using the Cochrane Review Manager software. The quality of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE method (Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation). We did not find any difference in the risk of complications or visual outcome in patients randomized to ISBCS or surgery on two different dates. The quality of evidence was rated as low to very low. None of the studies reported the prevalence of postoperative anisometropia. In conclusion, we cannot provide evidence-based recommendations on the use of ISBCS due to the lack of high quality evidence. Therefore, the decision to perform ISBCS should be taken after careful discussion between the surgeon and the patient.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of Ophthalmology
Vol/bind2015
Sider (fra-til)912481
ISSN2090-004X
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2015

ID: 45982192