Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Screening for cancer-related distress: Summary of evidence from tools to programmes

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  1. Biological optimization for mediastinal lymphoma radiotherapy - a preliminary study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. eHealth-mind the gap

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Tumour control probability after Ruthenium-106 brachytherapy for choroidal melanomas

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Circulating tumour DNA alterations as biomarkers for head and neck cancer: a systematic review

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  1. Depressive Symptoms in Danish Patients With Glioma and a Cancer-Free Comparison Group

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Oncology to specialised palliative home care systematic transition: the Domus randomised trial

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Total burden of disease in cancer patients at diagnosis-a Danish nationwide study of multimorbidity and redeemed medication

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. eHealth-mind the gap

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  5. Sexual Function and Quality of Life in a National Cohort of Survivors of Bilateral Testicular Cancer

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

INTRODUCTION: A number of studies have addressed the development and testing of tools for measuring cancer-related distress. Except for studies of diagnostic validity, knowledge on the effect of screening for psychological distress on psychological well-being is limited. We aimed to describe and critically discuss the findings of randomized trials of the effect of screening and to identify components necessary for future studies of the effectiveness of screening programmes.

METHODS: A search was made of the Embase/Medline and Web of Knowledge abstract databases from inception to September 2010. Our inclusion criterion was randomized controlled trials concerning the effect of screening for psychological distress on psychological outcomes. We compared the randomized trials on the following aspects: design and methods, setting and sample, screening and intervention, effects on psychological distress, staff utilization of screening results, possible confounding factors and other methodological limitations.

RESULTS: Of the seven identified randomized trials of the effect of screening for psychological distress, three showed an effect on psychological well-being, one showed an effect only among patients depressed at baseline, and three studies showed no effect. Several of the trials had methodological weaknesses and they were heterogeneous in design and content making direct comparisons difficult.

DISCUSSION: Future randomized trials are needed to examine comparative validity of different screening approaches and to evaluate the benefits of screening linked with associated treatment. Trials should include distress as a patient outcome, use appropriate samples, include a detailed, theory-based distress management plan, offer staff training and ideally track staff and patient use of subsequent interventions. Provisional work suggests that screening for psychological distress holds promise and is often clinically valuable, but it is too early to conclude definitively that psychological screening itself affects the psychological well-being of cancer patients.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftActa oncologica
Vol/bind50
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)194-204
Antal sider11
ISSN0284-186X
DOI
StatusUdgivet - feb. 2011

ID: 57389739