Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Perforated peptic ulcer: how to improve outcome?

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Pathophysiological-based treatments of complications of cirrhosis

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. True Chromogranin A concentrations in plasma from patients with small intestinal neuroendocrine tumours

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Plasma calprotectin is superior to serum calprotectin as a biomarker of intestinal inflammation in ulcerative Colitis

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Gastric cancer and gastrin: on the interaction of Helicobacter pylori gastritis and acid inhibitory induced hypergastrinemia

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Response

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Heterogeneity of treatment effect of prophylactic pantoprazole in adult ICU patients: a post hoc analysis of the SUP-ICU trial

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. APACHE II score validation in emergency abdominal surgery. A post hoc analysis of the InCare trial

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer
Despite the introduction of histamine H2-receptor antagonists, proton-pump inhibitors and the discovery of Helicobacter pylori, both the incidence of emergency surgery for perforated peptic ulcer and the mortality rate for patients undergoing surgery for peptic ulcer perforation have increased. This increase has occurred despite improvements in perioperative treatment and monitoring. To improve the outcome of these patients, it is necessary to investigate the reasons behind this high mortality rate. In this review we evaluate the existing evidence in order to identify significant risk factors with an emphasis on risks that are preventable. A systematic review including randomized studies was carried out. There are a limited number of studies of patients with peptic ulcer perforation. Most of these studies are of low evident status. Only a few randomized, controlled trials have been published. The mortality rate and the extent of postoperative complications are fairly high but the reasons for this have not been thoroughly explained, even though a number of risk factors have been identified. Some of these risk factors can be explained by the septic state of the patient on admission. In order to improve the outcome of patients with peptic ulcer perforation, sepsis needs to be factored into the existing knowledge and treatment.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftScandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology
Vol/bind44
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)15-22
Antal sider8
ISSN0036-5521
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 1 jan. 2009

ID: 32797542