Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Human Papillomavirus Assays and Cytology in Primary Cervical Screening of Women Aged 30 Years and Above

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Dokumenter

DOI

  1. Dyslipidemia at diagnosis of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Cytomegalovirus-specific CD8+ T-cell responses are associated with arterial blood pressure in people living with HIV

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Making the best of the worst: Care quality during emergency cesarean sections

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Prevalence, type distribution, and risk factors for oral HPV in Danish renal transplant recipients

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Clinical Utility of Human Papillomavirus Genotyping in Cervical Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Clinical performance of the HPV-Risk assay on cervical samples in SurePath medium using the VALGENT-4 panel

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. BAYESIAN ANALYSIS OF BASELINE RISK OF CIN2 AND ≥CIN3 BY HPV GENOTYPE IN A EUROPEAN REFERRAL COHORT

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

In women aged ≥30 years, Human Papillomavirus testing will replace cytology for primary cervical screening. We compared Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2), cobas, CLART, and APTIMA HPV assays with cytology on 2869 SurePath samples from women undergoing routine screening at 30-65 years in Copenhagen, Denmark. Women with cytological abnormalities were managed according to routine recommendations, with 92% completeness. Those with cytology-normal/HPV-positive samples (on any of the four assays) were invited for repeated cytology and HPV testing in 1.5 year, and 58% had additional testing. HPV testing detected more ≥CIN3 than cytology (HC2: 35, cobas, CLART: 37, APTIMA: 34, cytology: 31), although statistically the differences were not significant. Cobas and CLART detected significantly more ≥CIN2 than cytology (cobas, CLART: 49, cytology: 39). The proportion of women with false-positive test results (positive test results without ≥CIN3) varied between 3.3% with cytology and 14.9% with cobas. All HPV assays led to significantly more false-positive tests, whereas compared to HC2 cobas and CLART were associated with a significantly higher and APTIMA with a significantly lower proportion. Detection of CIN1 was particularly increased for the three DNA assays. With APTIMA combined with cytological triage, about 20% more women were referred for colposcopy than with cytology screening. With the three DNA assays, the increase was ≥50%. The number of women with repeated testing was twice as high with APTIMA and almost five times as high with cobas compared to cytology. To our knowledge, Horizon was the only study set in routine practice that compared more than two HPV assays in the same women while also ascertaining the histological status of women with normal cytology/HPV-positive test results. HPV-based screening of Danish women aged 30-65 detected more high-grade CIN but decreased the screening specificity, and increased the demand for additional testing.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftP L o S One
Vol/bind11
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)e0147326
ISSN1932-6203
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2016

Mest downloadede publikationer

Ingen data tilgængelig

ID: 46046581