TY - JOUR
T1 - How is intensive care reimbursed?
T2 - a review of eight European countries
AU - Bittner, Martin-Immanuel
AU - Donnelly, Maria
AU - van Zanten, Arthur Rh
AU - Andersen, Jakob Steen
AU - Guidet, Bertrand
AU - Trujillano Cabello, Jose Javier
AU - Gardiner, Shane
AU - Fitzpatrick, Gerard
AU - Winter, Bob
AU - Joannidis, Michael
AU - Schmutz, Axel
PY - 2013/11/12
Y1 - 2013/11/12
N2 - Reimbursement schemes in intensive care are more complex than in other areas of healthcare, due to special procedures and high care needs. Knowledge regarding the principles of functioning in other countries can lead to increased understanding and awareness of potential for improvement. This can be achieved through mutual exchange of solutions found in other countries. In this review, experts from eight European countries explain their respective intensive care unit reimbursement schemes. Important conclusions include the apparent differences in the countries' reimbursement schemes---despite all of them originating from a DRG system, the high degree of complexity found, and the difficulties faced in several countries when collecting the data for this collaborative work. This review has been designed to help the intensivist clinician and researcher to understanding neighbouring countries' approaches to clinical life and to putting research into the context of a European perspective. In addition, steering committees and decision makers might find this a valuable source to compare different reimbursement schemes.
AB - Reimbursement schemes in intensive care are more complex than in other areas of healthcare, due to special procedures and high care needs. Knowledge regarding the principles of functioning in other countries can lead to increased understanding and awareness of potential for improvement. This can be achieved through mutual exchange of solutions found in other countries. In this review, experts from eight European countries explain their respective intensive care unit reimbursement schemes. Important conclusions include the apparent differences in the countries' reimbursement schemes---despite all of them originating from a DRG system, the high degree of complexity found, and the difficulties faced in several countries when collecting the data for this collaborative work. This review has been designed to help the intensivist clinician and researcher to understanding neighbouring countries' approaches to clinical life and to putting research into the context of a European perspective. In addition, steering committees and decision makers might find this a valuable source to compare different reimbursement schemes.
U2 - 10.1186/2110-5820-3-37
DO - 10.1186/2110-5820-3-37
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 24216146
VL - 3
SP - 37
JO - Annals of Intensive Care
JF - Annals of Intensive Care
SN - 2110-5820
IS - 1
ER -