Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital

How donor selection criteria can be evaluated with limited scientific evidence: lessons learned from the TRANSPOSE project

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review


  1. Validation of a standardized donor health questionnaire across substances of human origin

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Determinants of intention to return to donate blood among first-time blood donors in Ghana

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Comprehensive genome-wide association study of different forms of hernia identifies more than 80 associated loci

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Impaired allocentric spatial memory in patients with affective disorders

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  • Christina Mikkelsen
  • Gaia Mori
  • Suzanna M van Walraven
  • Johanna Castrén
  • Sharon Zahra
  • Sheila MacLennan
  • Kirsten Seidel
  • Stefano Fontana
  • Eva Veropalumbo
  • Livia Cannata
  • Simonetta Pupella
  • Maria Kvist
  • Marjan Happel
  • Piia Korkalainen
  • Akila Chandrasekar
  • Ulrike Paulus
  • Arlinke Bokhorst
  • Birgit Wulff
  • Jesus Fernandez-Sojo
  • Cristina Eguizabal
  • Fernando Urbano
  • Miguel Angel Vesga
  • Marian van Kraaij
  • Eva-Maria Merz
  • Katja van den Hurk
  • Morten Bagge Hansen
  • Ed Slot
  • Henrik Ullum
Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Donor selection criteria (DSC) are a vital link in the chain of supply of Substances of Human Origin (SoHO) but are also subject to controversy and differences of opinion. Traditionally, DSC have been based on application of the precautionary principle.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2017 to 2020, TRANSPOSE (TRANSfusion and transplantation PrOtection and SElection of donors), a European research project, aimed to identify discrepancies between current DSC by proposing a standardized risk assessment method for all SoHO (solid organs excluded) and all levels of evidence.

RESULTS: The current DSC were assessed using a modified risk assessment method based on the Alliance of Blood Operators' Risk-based decision-making framework for blood safety. It was found that with limited or diverging scientific evidence, it was difficult to reach consensus and an international standardized method for decision-making was lacking. Furthermore, participants found it hard to disregard their local guidelines when providing expert opinion, which resulted in substantial influence on the consensus-based decision-making process.

CONCLUSIONS: While the field of donation-safety research is expanding rapidly, there is an urgent need to formalize the decision-making process regarding DSC. This includes the need for standardized methods to increase transparency in the international decision-making process and to ensure that this is performed consistently. Our framework provides an easy-to-implement approach for standardizing risk assessments, especially in the context of limited scientific evidence.

TidsskriftVox Sanguinis
Udgave nummer3
Sider (fra-til)342-350
Antal sider9
StatusUdgivet - mar. 2021

ID: 61697292