TY - JOUR
T1 - Hemodynamics and vasopressor support during targeted temperature management at 33°C Versus 36°C after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
T2 - a post hoc study of the target temperature management trial*
AU - Bro-Jeppesen, John
AU - Annborn, Martin
AU - Hassager, Christian
AU - Wise, Matt P
AU - Pelosi, Paolo
AU - Nielsen, Niklas
AU - Erlinge, David
AU - Wanscher, Michael
AU - Friberg, Hans
AU - Kjaergaard, Jesper
AU - TTM Investigators
PY - 2015/2
Y1 - 2015/2
N2 - OBJECTIVE: To investigate the hemodynamic profile associated with different target temperatures and to assess the prognostic implication of inotropic/vasopressor support and mean arterial pressure after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. There is a lack of information how different target temperatures may affect hemodynamics.DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of a prospective randomized study.SETTING: Thirty-six ICUs in 10 countries.PATIENTS: Nine hundred twenty patients (97%) with available vasopressor data out of 950 patients from the Target Temperature Management trial randomly assigned patients to a targeted temperature management at 33 °C or 36 °C.INTERVENTIONS: None.MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and lactate were registered at prespecified time points. The population was stratified according to cardiovascular Sequential Organ Failure Assessment = 4 defining the high vasopressor group and cardiovascular Sequential Organ Failure Assessment less than or equal to 3 defining the low vasopressor group. The targeted temperature management 33 (TTM33) group had a hemodynamic profile with lower heart rate (-7.0 min(-1) [95% confidence limit, -8.7, -5.1]; p(group) < 0.0001), similar mean arterial pressure (-1.1 mm Hg [95% confidence limit, -2.3, 0.2]; p(group) = 0.10), and increased lactate (0.6 mmol/L [95% confidence limit, 0.3, 0.8]; p(group) < 0.0001) compared with the targeted temperature management 36 (TTM36) group. A cardiovascular Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score = 4 was recorded in 54% versus 45%, p = 0.03 in the TTM33 and the TTM36 group, respectively. The high vasopressor group carried a 53% mortality rate when compared with a 34% in the low vasopressor group, p(log-rank) less than 0.0001, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.38 (95% CI, 1.11-1.71; p = 0.004). There was no interaction between vasopressor group and allocated target temperature group (p = 0.40). An inverse relationship between mean arterial pressure and mortality was identified (p = 0.0008).CONCLUSIONS: Targeted temperature management at 33 °C was associated with hemodynamic alterations with decreased heart rate, elevated levels of lactate, and need for increased vasopressor support compared with targeted temperature management at 36 °C. Low mean arterial pressure and need for high doses of vasopressors were associated with increased mortality independent of allocated targeted temperature management.
AB - OBJECTIVE: To investigate the hemodynamic profile associated with different target temperatures and to assess the prognostic implication of inotropic/vasopressor support and mean arterial pressure after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. There is a lack of information how different target temperatures may affect hemodynamics.DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of a prospective randomized study.SETTING: Thirty-six ICUs in 10 countries.PATIENTS: Nine hundred twenty patients (97%) with available vasopressor data out of 950 patients from the Target Temperature Management trial randomly assigned patients to a targeted temperature management at 33 °C or 36 °C.INTERVENTIONS: None.MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and lactate were registered at prespecified time points. The population was stratified according to cardiovascular Sequential Organ Failure Assessment = 4 defining the high vasopressor group and cardiovascular Sequential Organ Failure Assessment less than or equal to 3 defining the low vasopressor group. The targeted temperature management 33 (TTM33) group had a hemodynamic profile with lower heart rate (-7.0 min(-1) [95% confidence limit, -8.7, -5.1]; p(group) < 0.0001), similar mean arterial pressure (-1.1 mm Hg [95% confidence limit, -2.3, 0.2]; p(group) = 0.10), and increased lactate (0.6 mmol/L [95% confidence limit, 0.3, 0.8]; p(group) < 0.0001) compared with the targeted temperature management 36 (TTM36) group. A cardiovascular Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score = 4 was recorded in 54% versus 45%, p = 0.03 in the TTM33 and the TTM36 group, respectively. The high vasopressor group carried a 53% mortality rate when compared with a 34% in the low vasopressor group, p(log-rank) less than 0.0001, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.38 (95% CI, 1.11-1.71; p = 0.004). There was no interaction between vasopressor group and allocated target temperature group (p = 0.40). An inverse relationship between mean arterial pressure and mortality was identified (p = 0.0008).CONCLUSIONS: Targeted temperature management at 33 °C was associated with hemodynamic alterations with decreased heart rate, elevated levels of lactate, and need for increased vasopressor support compared with targeted temperature management at 36 °C. Low mean arterial pressure and need for high doses of vasopressors were associated with increased mortality independent of allocated targeted temperature management.
KW - Age Factors
KW - Aged
KW - Body Temperature
KW - Comorbidity
KW - Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
KW - Female
KW - Hemodynamics
KW - Humans
KW - Hypothermia, Induced
KW - Intensive Care Units
KW - Lactic Acid
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Organ Dysfunction Scores
KW - Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
KW - Prognosis
KW - Prospective Studies
KW - Sex Factors
KW - Single-Blind Method
KW - Vasoconstrictor Agents
U2 - 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000691
DO - 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000691
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 25365723
SN - 0090-3493
VL - 43
SP - 318
EP - 327
JO - Critical Care Medicine
JF - Critical Care Medicine
IS - 2
ER -