TY - JOUR
T1 - Healthy Weight Loss Maintenance with Exercise, Liraglutide, or Both Combined
AU - Lundgren, Julie R
AU - Janus, Charlotte
AU - Jensen, Simon B K
AU - Juhl, Christian R
AU - Olsen, Lisa M
AU - Christensen, Rasmus M
AU - Svane, Maria S
AU - Bandholm, Thomas
AU - Bojsen-Møller, Kirstine N
AU - Blond, Martin B
AU - Jensen, Jens-Erik B
AU - Stallknecht, Bente M
AU - Holst, Jens J
AU - Madsbad, Sten
AU - Torekov, Signe S
N1 - Copyright © 2021 Massachusetts Medical Society.
PY - 2021/5/6
Y1 - 2021/5/6
N2 - BACKGROUND Weight regain after weight loss is a major problem in the treatment of persons with obesity. METHODS In a randomized, head-to-head, placebo-controlled trial, we enrolled adults with obesity (body-mass index [the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters], 32 to 43) who did not have diabetes. After an 8-week low-calorie diet, participants were randomly assigned for 1 year to one of four strategies: a moderate-to-vigorous–intensity exercise program plus placebo (exercise group); treatment with liraglutide (3.0 mg per day) plus usual activity (liraglutide group); exercise program plus liraglutide therapy (combination group); or placebo plus usual activity (placebo group). End points with prespecified hypotheses were the change in body weight (primary end point) and the change in body-fat percentage (secondary end point) from randomization to the end of the treatment period in the intention-to-treat population. Prespecified metabolic health-related end points and safety were also assessed. RESULTS After the 8-week low-calorie diet, 195 participants had a mean decrease in body weight of 13.1 kg. At 1 year, all the active-treatment strategies led to greater weight loss than placebo: difference in the exercise group, −4.1 kg (95% confidence interval [CI], −7.8 to −0.4; P=0.03); in the liraglutide group, −6.8 kg (95% CI, −10.4 to −3.1; P<0.001); and in the combination group, −9.5 kg (95% CI, −13.1 to −5.9; P<0.001). The combination strategy led to greater weight loss than exercise (difference, −5.4 kg; 95% CI, −9.0 to −1.7; P=0.004) but not liraglutide (−2.7 kg; 95% CI, −6.3 to 0.8; P=0.13). The combination strategy decreased body-fat percentage by 3.9 percentage points, which was approximately twice the decrease in the exercise group (−1.7 percentage points; 95% CI, −3.2 to −0.2; P=0.02) and the liraglutide group (−1.9 percentage points; 95% CI, −3.3 to −0.5; P=0.009). Only the combination strategy was associated with improvements in the glycated hemoglobin level, insulin sensitivity, and cardiorespiratory fitness. Increased heart rate and cholelithiasis were observed more often in the liraglutide group than in the combination group. CONCLUSIONS A strategy combining exercise and liraglutide therapy improved healthy weight loss maintenance more than either treatment alone.
AB - BACKGROUND Weight regain after weight loss is a major problem in the treatment of persons with obesity. METHODS In a randomized, head-to-head, placebo-controlled trial, we enrolled adults with obesity (body-mass index [the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters], 32 to 43) who did not have diabetes. After an 8-week low-calorie diet, participants were randomly assigned for 1 year to one of four strategies: a moderate-to-vigorous–intensity exercise program plus placebo (exercise group); treatment with liraglutide (3.0 mg per day) plus usual activity (liraglutide group); exercise program plus liraglutide therapy (combination group); or placebo plus usual activity (placebo group). End points with prespecified hypotheses were the change in body weight (primary end point) and the change in body-fat percentage (secondary end point) from randomization to the end of the treatment period in the intention-to-treat population. Prespecified metabolic health-related end points and safety were also assessed. RESULTS After the 8-week low-calorie diet, 195 participants had a mean decrease in body weight of 13.1 kg. At 1 year, all the active-treatment strategies led to greater weight loss than placebo: difference in the exercise group, −4.1 kg (95% confidence interval [CI], −7.8 to −0.4; P=0.03); in the liraglutide group, −6.8 kg (95% CI, −10.4 to −3.1; P<0.001); and in the combination group, −9.5 kg (95% CI, −13.1 to −5.9; P<0.001). The combination strategy led to greater weight loss than exercise (difference, −5.4 kg; 95% CI, −9.0 to −1.7; P=0.004) but not liraglutide (−2.7 kg; 95% CI, −6.3 to 0.8; P=0.13). The combination strategy decreased body-fat percentage by 3.9 percentage points, which was approximately twice the decrease in the exercise group (−1.7 percentage points; 95% CI, −3.2 to −0.2; P=0.02) and the liraglutide group (−1.9 percentage points; 95% CI, −3.3 to −0.5; P=0.009). Only the combination strategy was associated with improvements in the glycated hemoglobin level, insulin sensitivity, and cardiorespiratory fitness. Increased heart rate and cholelithiasis were observed more often in the liraglutide group than in the combination group. CONCLUSIONS A strategy combining exercise and liraglutide therapy improved healthy weight loss maintenance more than either treatment alone.
KW - Adipose Tissue
KW - Adult
KW - Anti-Obesity Agents/adverse effects
KW - Body Size
KW - Caloric Restriction
KW - Combined Modality Therapy
KW - Exercise Therapy
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Liraglutide/adverse effects
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Obesity/diet therapy
KW - Weight Loss/drug effects
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105435475&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1056/NEJMoa2028198
DO - 10.1056/NEJMoa2028198
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 33951361
SN - 0028-4793
VL - 384
SP - 1719
EP - 1730
JO - The New England journal of medicine
JF - The New England journal of medicine
IS - 18
M1 - Moa2028198
ER -