TY - JOUR
T1 - Healthcare Professionals' and Users' Experiences of Intersectoral Care between Hospital and Community Mental Healthcare
AU - Jørgensen, Kim
AU - Jørgensen, Kim
AU - Bonde Dahl, Mette
AU - Frederiksen, Jesper
PY - 2020/9/7
Y1 - 2020/9/7
N2 - This paper explores healthcare professionals' and users' experience of coherent intersectoral care between hospital mental healthcare and community mental healthcare. A total of 20 healthcare professionals, primarily nurses, and 14 users with a range of mental illnesses participated in nine focus group interviews (FGIs). Participants were encouraged in the FGIs to reflect upon their experience of coherency in intersectoral care. The analysis of FGIs was informed by a phenomenological-hermeneutic approach in a research group from 2016-2019. The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist was used as a guideline to ensure complete and accurate reporting of the study. The analysis led to the generation of several themes from a professional perspective and from a user perspective, addressed barriers to coherent intersectoral care. The healthcare professionals experienced barriers such as a lack of common language and knowledge of partners. The users did not feel involved and lacked coherence in their recovery processes and, as such, intersectoral care was often experienced as being lost in a maze.
AB - This paper explores healthcare professionals' and users' experience of coherent intersectoral care between hospital mental healthcare and community mental healthcare. A total of 20 healthcare professionals, primarily nurses, and 14 users with a range of mental illnesses participated in nine focus group interviews (FGIs). Participants were encouraged in the FGIs to reflect upon their experience of coherency in intersectoral care. The analysis of FGIs was informed by a phenomenological-hermeneutic approach in a research group from 2016-2019. The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist was used as a guideline to ensure complete and accurate reporting of the study. The analysis led to the generation of several themes from a professional perspective and from a user perspective, addressed barriers to coherent intersectoral care. The healthcare professionals experienced barriers such as a lack of common language and knowledge of partners. The users did not feel involved and lacked coherence in their recovery processes and, as such, intersectoral care was often experienced as being lost in a maze.
KW - Community Mental Health Services
KW - Continuity of Patient Care
KW - Delivery of Health Care
KW - Health Personnel
KW - Hospitals
KW - Humans
KW - Inpatients
KW - Mental Disorders/therapy
KW - Qualitative Research
KW - Hospitals’ mental healthcare
KW - Patient participation
KW - Healthcare professionals
KW - Multiprofessional care
KW - Users
KW - Recovery
KW - Community mental healthcare
KW - Intersectoral care
KW - Nurse
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85090613968&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/ijerph17186510
DO - 10.3390/ijerph17186510
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 32906796
SN - 1661-7827
VL - 17
SP - 1
EP - 15
JO - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
JF - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
IS - 18
M1 - 6510
ER -