Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Head to head comparison of two commercial fecal calprotectin kits as predictor of Mayo endoscopic sub-score and mucosal TNF expression in ulcerative colitis

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Cytomegalovirus-specific CD8+ T-cell responses are associated with arterial blood pressure in people living with HIV

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Making the best of the worst: Care quality during emergency cesarean sections

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Seasonality of ventricular fibrillation at first myocardial infarction and association with viral exposure

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Telemedicin til monitorering af inflammatoriske tarmsygdomme og colon irritabile

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Plasma calprotectin is superior to serum calprotectin as a biomarker of intestinal inflammation in ulcerative Colitis

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Coping Among Parents of Teens With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Serum Calprotectin in Adolescents with Inflammatory Bowel Disease - A Pilot Investigation

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  5. A Personalized eHealth Transition Concept for Adolescents With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Design of Intervention

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  • Rasmus Goll
  • Richard Heitmann
  • Øystein Kittel Moe
  • Katrine Carlsen
  • Jon Florholmen
Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: Fecal calprotectin is widely used to monitor disease activity in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Multiple commercial kits exist, however, since the analyses are not standardized, these kits cannot be used interchangeably. We aimed to perform a technical evaluation of two kits (Calpro from Calprolab, Norway and Calprest from Eurospital, Italy) and perform a tuning for detection of clinically relevant disease states in ulcerative colitis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: For tuning against different clinical states a total of 116 patients with ulcerative colitis were recruited (67 of which were part of an earlier publication). For the technical evaluation an additional series of 80 random samples from the hospital lab were included. Technical evaluation was done by correlation and limits of agreement analysis; cut-off levels were explored by ROC analysis against clinically relevant actual states.

RESULTS: The technical evaluation revealed good correlation between assays, however a non-linear difference was found: At values below 200 mg/kg, no significant bias was found; in the interval 200-1000 mg/kg the Calprest assay measured on average 30% lower than Calpro; and at higher values Calprest measured 60% higher values than Calpro. Both assays predicted Mayo endoscopic score (MES) 0 (cutoff 28: sensitivity 0.38; specificity 0.82 for Calprest; cutoff 28: sensitivity 0.50; specificity 0.77 for Calpro), and MES 2-3 (cutoff 148: sensitivity 0.72; specificity 0.80 for Calprest; cutoff 208: sensitivity 0.64; specificity 0.80 for Calpro), but did not predict normalization of mucosal TNF transcript per se. A combination of calprotectin and MES predicted mucosal TNF transcript values reasonably well (Calpro: sensitivity 0.85, specificity 0.58; Calprest: sensitivity 0.85, specificity 0.61).

CONCLUSION: The Calpro and Calprest assays correlated well, but subtle differences were found, underlining the need for kit-specific cut-off values. Both kits were most precise in predicting active inflammation (MES 2-3), but less so for prediction of mucosal healing (MES 0) and normalization of mucosal TNF gene expression.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummere0224895
TidsskriftPLoS One
Vol/bind14
Udgave nummer12
Antal sider12
ISSN1932-6203
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2 dec. 2019

ID: 58515158