TY - JOUR
T1 - Harnessing machine learning to predict antibiotic susceptibility in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms
AU - Vergauwe, Fauve
AU - De Waele, Gaetan
AU - Sass, Andrea
AU - Highmore, Callum
AU - Hanrahan, Niall
AU - Cook, Yoshiki
AU - Lichtenberg, Mads
AU - Cnockaert, Margo
AU - Vandamme, Peter
AU - Mahajan, Sumeet
AU - Webb, Jeremy S
AU - Van Nieuwerburgh, Filip
AU - Bjarnsholt, Thomas
AU - Waegeman, Willem
AU - Coenye, Tom
N1 - © 2025. The Author(s).
PY - 2025/11/10
Y1 - 2025/11/10
N2 - Antibiotic susceptibility tests (ASTs) often fail to predict treatment outcomes because they do not account for biofilm-specific tolerance mechanisms. In the present study, we explored alternative approaches to predict tobramycin susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms that were experimentally evolved in physiologically relevant conditions. To this end, we used four analytical methods - whole-genome sequencing (WGS), matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), isothermal microcalorimetry (IMC) and multi-excitation Raman spectroscopy (MX-Raman). Machine learning models were trained on data outputs from these methods to predict tobramycin susceptibility of our evolved strains and validated with a collection of clinical isolates. For minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) predictions of the evolved strains, the highest accuracy was achieved with MALDI-TOF MS (97.83%), while for biofilm prevention concentration (BPC) predictions, Raman spectroscopy performed best with an accuracy of 80.43%. Overall, all analytical methods demonstrated comparable predictive performance, showing their potential for improving biofilm AST.
AB - Antibiotic susceptibility tests (ASTs) often fail to predict treatment outcomes because they do not account for biofilm-specific tolerance mechanisms. In the present study, we explored alternative approaches to predict tobramycin susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms that were experimentally evolved in physiologically relevant conditions. To this end, we used four analytical methods - whole-genome sequencing (WGS), matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), isothermal microcalorimetry (IMC) and multi-excitation Raman spectroscopy (MX-Raman). Machine learning models were trained on data outputs from these methods to predict tobramycin susceptibility of our evolved strains and validated with a collection of clinical isolates. For minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) predictions of the evolved strains, the highest accuracy was achieved with MALDI-TOF MS (97.83%), while for biofilm prevention concentration (BPC) predictions, Raman spectroscopy performed best with an accuracy of 80.43%. Overall, all analytical methods demonstrated comparable predictive performance, showing their potential for improving biofilm AST.
KW - Biofilms/drug effects
KW - Pseudomonas aeruginosa/drug effects
KW - Machine Learning
KW - Microbial Sensitivity Tests/methods
KW - Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology
KW - Spectrum Analysis, Raman
KW - Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization
KW - Whole Genome Sequencing
KW - Tobramycin/pharmacology
KW - Humans
KW - Pseudomonas Infections/microbiology
U2 - 10.1038/s41522-025-00833-4
DO - 10.1038/s41522-025-00833-4
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 41213976
SN - 2055-5008
VL - 11
SP - 205
JO - NPJ biofilms and microbiomes
JF - NPJ biofilms and microbiomes
IS - 1
M1 - 205
ER -