Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Hand-Held Ultrasound Devices Compared with High-End Ultrasound Systems: A Systematic Review

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Pressure Difference Estimation in Non-stenotic Carotid Bifurcation Phantoms Using Vector Flow Imaging

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Evaluation of 2D super-resolution ultrasound imaging of the rat renal vasculature using ex vivo micro-computed tomography

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Highlights of the development in ultrasound during the last 70 years: A historical review

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

The aim of this study was to review the scientific literature available on the comparison of hand-held ultrasound devices with high-end systems for abdominal and pleural applications. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane were searched following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Original research describing hand-held ultrasound devices compared with high-end systems was included and assessed using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS)-2. The search was limited to articles published since 1 January 2012. A total of 2486 articles were found and screened by title and abstract. A total of 16 articles were chosen for final review. All of the included articles showed good overall agreement between hand-held and high-end ultrasound systems. Strong correlations were found when evaluating ascites, hydronephrosis, pleural cavities, in detection of abdominal aortic aneurysms and for use with obstetric and gynaecological patients. Other articles found good agreement for cholelithiasis and for determining the best site for paracentesis. QUADAS-2 analysis suggested few risks of bias and almost no concerns regarding applicability. For distinct clinical questions, hand-held devices may be a valuable supplement to physical examination. However, evidence is inadequate, and more research is needed on the abdominal and pleural use of hand-held ultrasound with more standardised comparisons, using only blinded reviewers.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummer61
TidsskriftDiagnostics
Vol/bind9
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)E61
ISSN2075-4418
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 1 jun. 2019

ID: 58457570