Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed

Jan Kottner, Laurent Audige, Stig Brorson, Allan Donner, Byron J Gajewski, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, Chris Roberts, Mohamed Shoukri, David L Streiner

    576 Citationer (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Results of reliability and agreement studies are intended to provide information about the amount of error inherent in any diagnosis, score, or measurement. The level of reliability and agreement among users of scales, instruments, or classifications is widely unknown. Therefore, there is a need for rigorously conducted interrater and intrarater reliability and agreement studies. Information about sample selection, study design, and statistical analysis is often incomplete. Because of inadequate reporting, interpretation and synthesis of study results are often difficult. Widely accepted criteria, standards, or guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement in the health care and medical field are lacking. The objective was to develop guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies.
    OriginalsprogEngelsk
    TidsskriftInternational Journal of Nursing Studies
    Vol/bind48
    Udgave nummer6
    Sider (fra-til)661-71
    Antal sider11
    ISSN0020-7489
    DOI
    StatusUdgivet - 2011

    Fingeraftryk

    Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

    Citationsformater