Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Grading lumbar disc degeneration: a comparison between low- and high-field MRI

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. UTE T2* mapping of tendinopathic patellar tendons: an MRI reproducibility study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Tattoo complications and magnetic resonance imaging: a comprehensive review of the literature

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. New Section Editor: Cardiac and Cardiovascular Imaging

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelFormidling

  4. The accuracy of titanium contrast-enhanced mammography: a retrospective multicentric study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  5. Adherence to guidelines aimed at preventing post-contrast acute kidney injury (PC-AKI) in radiology practices: a survey study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Positional changes in lumbar disc herniation during standing or lumbar extension: a cross-sectional weight-bearing MRI study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. UTE T2* mapping of tendinopathic patellar tendons: an MRI reproducibility study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: More advanced disc degeneration on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is found in individuals with low back pain. However, it is unclear whether this grading is independent of the scanner's field strength.

PURPOSE: To compare disc degeneration on high- versus low-field MRI.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: Low back pain patients were enrolled to undergo high-field (3 T) MRI, followed by low-field (0.25 T) MRI of the lumbar spine within 3 h. Three radiologists graded the disc degeneration on Pfirrmann's grading scale with a hiatus of 3 months. A subsample was regraded 6 months later. Reproducibility was measured by weighted kappa statistics (using PROC FREQ statement with AGREE in the TABLES statement for SAS), absolute agreement (i.e. 1:1 agreement/the total number) and the difference in the prevalence (McNemar test).

RESULTS: Moderate to substantial agreement (κ = 0.52-0.62) and absolute agreement of 43.8-66.1% were found between field strengths. Low-field MRI tended to have numerically higher and lower grades than high-field MRI resulting in a significant difference in the prevalence of grades ( p < 0.001). Both field strengths resulted in a moderate to substantial inter-reader agreement (low-field: κ = 0.63, 0.63, 0.54 and high-field: κ = 0.55, 0.43, 0.53) and intra-reader agreement (high-field: κ = 0.57, 0.77, 0.67 and low-field: κ = 0.51, 0.50, 0.70). Only, the reader with the shortest experience had better agreement with high-field compared to low-field.

CONCLUSIONS: There were a significant difference in the prevalence of disc degeneration grading between 0.25 T and 3 T MRI. Therefore, field strength should be taken into consideration when comparing studies using disc degeneration grading as an outcome.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftActa Radiologica
Vol/bind60
Udgave nummer12
Sider (fra-til)1636-1642
Antal sider7
ISSN0284-1851
DOI
StatusUdgivet - dec. 2019

ID: 58098420