Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Grading lumbar disc degeneration: a comparison between low- and high-field MRI

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. New Section Editor: Chest Imaging

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelFormidling

  2. New section editor: Abdominal and Gastrointestinal Radiology

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelFormidling

  3. New MSK editor

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelFormidling

  4. The effects of rotation on radiological parameters in the spine

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Acute Tentorial Subdural Hematoma Caused by Rupture of the Posterior Cerebral Artery after Minor Trauma-A Case Report

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Early development of tendinopathy in humans: Sequence of pathological changes in structure and tissue turnover signaling

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Weight-bearing MRI of the Lumbar Spine: Spinal Stenosis and Spondylolisthesis

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: More advanced disc degeneration on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is found in individuals with low back pain. However, it is unclear whether this grading is independent of the scanner's field strength.

PURPOSE: To compare disc degeneration on high- versus low-field MRI.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: Low back pain patients were enrolled to undergo high-field (3 T) MRI, followed by low-field (0.25 T) MRI of the lumbar spine within 3 h. Three radiologists graded the disc degeneration on Pfirrmann's grading scale with a hiatus of 3 months. A subsample was regraded 6 months later. Reproducibility was measured by weighted kappa statistics (using PROC FREQ statement with AGREE in the TABLES statement for SAS), absolute agreement (i.e. 1:1 agreement/the total number) and the difference in the prevalence (McNemar test).

RESULTS: Moderate to substantial agreement (κ = 0.52-0.62) and absolute agreement of 43.8-66.1% were found between field strengths. Low-field MRI tended to have numerically higher and lower grades than high-field MRI resulting in a significant difference in the prevalence of grades ( p < 0.001). Both field strengths resulted in a moderate to substantial inter-reader agreement (low-field: κ = 0.63, 0.63, 0.54 and high-field: κ = 0.55, 0.43, 0.53) and intra-reader agreement (high-field: κ = 0.57, 0.77, 0.67 and low-field: κ = 0.51, 0.50, 0.70). Only, the reader with the shortest experience had better agreement with high-field compared to low-field.

CONCLUSIONS: There were a significant difference in the prevalence of disc degeneration grading between 0.25 T and 3 T MRI. Therefore, field strength should be taken into consideration when comparing studies using disc degeneration grading as an outcome.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftActa Radiologica
Vol/bind60
Udgave nummer12
Sider (fra-til)1636-1642
Antal sider7
ISSN0284-1851
DOI
StatusUdgivet - dec. 2019

ID: 58098420