Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Good interobserver agreement was attainable on outcome adjudication in patients with stable coronary heart disease

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Consideration of confounding was suboptimal in the reporting of observational studies in psychiatry: a meta-epidemiological study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Overall bias and sample sizes were unchanged in ICU trials over time: a meta-epidemiological study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  3. Transparent and systematic reporting of meta-epidemiological studies

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Sedentary work and risk of venous thromboembolism

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Sertraline in primary care: comments on the PANDA trial

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer
In clinical trials, agreement on outcomes is of utmost importance for valid estimation of intervention effects. As there is limited knowledge about adjudicator agreement in cardiology, we examined the level of agreement among three cardiology specialists adjudicating all possible events in a randomized controlled clinical trial of patients with stable coronary heart disease.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Vol/bind65
Udgave nummer4
Sider (fra-til)444-53
Antal sider10
ISSN0895-4356
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2012

ID: 34716336