Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Function, information, and contributions: An evaluation of national multidisciplinary team meetings for rare cancers

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Anal Cancer debuting as Cancer of Unknown Primary

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Rational targeting of population groups and residential areas for colorectal cancer screening

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Publishing your trial protocols with Acta Oncologica; your contribution to scientific transparency

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Risk of multiple colorectal cancer development depends on age and subgroup in individuals with hereditary predisposition

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  • Linn Rosell
  • Jessica Wihl
  • Oskar Hagberg
  • Björn Ohlsson
  • Mef Nilbert
Vis graf over relationer

National virtual multidisciplinary team meetings have been established in Swedish cancer care in response to centralized treatment of rare cancers. Though national meetings grant access to a large multidisciplinary network, we hypothesized that video-based meetings may challenge participants' contributions to the case discussions. We investigated participants' views and used observational tools to assess contributions from various health professionals during the multidisciplinary team meetings. Data on participants' views were collected using an electronic survey distributed to participants in six national multidisciplinary team meetings for rare cancers. Data from observations were obtained from the multidisciplinary team meetings for penile cancer, anal cancer, and vulvar cancer using the standardized observational tools Meeting Observational Tool and Metric of Decision-Making that assess multidisciplinary team meeting functionality and participants' contributions to the case discussions. Participants overall rated the multidisciplinary team meetings favorably with high scores for development of individual competence and team competence. Lower scores applied to multidisciplinary team meeting technology, principles for communicating treatment recommendations, and guidelines for evaluating the meetings. Observational assessment resulted in high scores for case histories, leadership, and teamwork, whereas patient-centered care and involvement of care professionals received low scores. National virtual multidisciplinary team meetings are feasible and receive positive ratings by the participants. Case discussions cover medical perspectives well, whereas patient-centered aspects achieve less attention. Based on these findings, we discuss factors to consider to further improve treatment recommendations from national multidisciplinary team meetings.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftRare Tumors
Vol/bind11
ISSN2036-3605
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 8 maj 2019

ID: 57229048