Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study

Nico H J Pijls, William F Fearon, Pim A L Tonino, Uwe Siebert, Fumiaki Ikeno, Bernhard Bornschein, Marcel van't Veer, Volker Klauss, Ganesh Manoharan, Thomas Engstrøm, Keith G Oldroyd, Peter N Ver Lee, Philip A MacCarthy, Bernard De Bruyne, FAME Study Investigators, Jens Kastrup (Medlem af forfattergruppering)

    1002 Citationer (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The purpose of this study was to investigate the 2-year outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) guided by fractional flow reserve (FFR) in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD).
    OriginalsprogEngelsk
    TidsskriftJournal of the American College of Cardiology
    Vol/bind56
    Udgave nummer3
    Sider (fra-til)177-84
    Antal sider8
    DOI
    StatusUdgivet - 13 jul. 2010

    Fingeraftryk

    Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

    Citationsformater