Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Flow measurement at the aortic root - impact of location of through-plane phase contrast velocity mapping

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Changes in overall ventricular myocardial architecture in the setting of a porcine animal model of right ventricular dilation

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Transient left atrial dysfunction is a feature of Takotsubo syndrome

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Myocardial T1 maps reflect histological findings in acute and chronic stages of myocarditis in a rat model

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Switching from Vitamin K Antagonist to Dabigatran in Atrial Fibrillation: Differences According to Dose

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Vitamin K antagonists vs. direct oral anticoagulants after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in atrial fibrillation

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Pulmonary Arterial Enlargement in Well-Treated Persons With Human Immunodeficiency Virus

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Left ventricular myocardial crypts: morphological patterns and prognostic implications

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  5. Left ventricular trabeculation and major adverse cardiovascular events: the Copenhagen General Population Study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is considered the gold standard of cardiac volumetric measurements. Flow in the aortic root is often measured at the sinotubular junction, even though placing the slice just above valve level may be more precise. It is unknown how much flow measurements vary at different levels in the aortic root and which level corresponds best to left ventricle volumetry.

METHODS: All patients were older than 70 years presenting with at least one of the following diagnoses: diabetes, hypertension, prior stroke and/or heart failure. Patients with arrhythmias during CMR and aortic stenosis were excluded from the analyses. Stroke volumes were measured volumetrically (SVref) from steady-state free precision short axis images covering the entire left ventricle, excluding the papillary muscles and including the left ventricular outflow tract. Flow sequences (through-plane phase contrast velocity mapping) were obtained at valve level (SVV) and at the sinotubular junction (SVST). Firstly, SVV and SVST were compared to each other and secondly, after excluding patients with mitral regurgitations to ensure that stroke volumes measured volumetrically would theoretically be equal to flow measurements, SVV and SVST were compared to SVref.

RESULTS: Initially, 152 patients were included. 22 were excluded because of arrhythmias during scans and 9 were excluded for aortic stenosis. Accordingly, data from 121 patients were analysed and of these 63 had visually evident mitral regurgitation on cine images. On average, stroke volumes measured with flow at the sinotubular junction was 13-16 % lower than when measured at valve level (70.0 mL ±13.8 vs. 81.8 mL ±15.5). This was in excess of the expected difference caused by the outflow to the coronary arteries. In the 58 patients with no valvulopathy, stroke volumes measured at valve level (79.0 mL ±12.4) was closest to the volumetric measurement (85.4 mL ±12.0) but still significantly lower (p < 0.001). Flow measured at the ST-junction (68.1 mL ±11.6) was significantly lower than at valve level and the volumetric measurements. The mean difference between SVref-SVV (6.4 mL) and SVref-SVST (18.2 mL) showed similar variances (SD 7.4 vs. 8.1 respectively) and hence equal accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS: Aortic flow measured at valve level corresponded best with volumetric measurements and on average flow measured at the sinotubular junction underestimated flow approximately 15 % compared to valve level.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02036450 . Registered 08/01/2014.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Vol/bind18
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)55
ISSN1532-429X
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 7 sep. 2016

ID: 49106182