TY - JOUR
T1 - Fixed-Duration versus Continuous Treatment for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
AU - Al-Sawaf, Othman
AU - Stumpf, Janina
AU - Zhang, Can
AU - Simon, Florian
AU - Bosch, Francesc
AU - Feyzi, Emadoldin
AU - Ghia, Paolo
AU - Gregor, Michael
AU - Kater, Arnon P
AU - Lindström, Vesa
AU - Mattsson, Mattias
AU - Niemann, Carsten U
AU - Staber, Philipp B
AU - Tadmor, Tamar
AU - Thornton, Patrick
AU - Wendtner, Clemens-Martin
AU - Janssens, Ann
AU - Noesslinger, Thomas
AU - Bohn, Jan-Paul
AU - da Cunha-Bang, Caspar
AU - Poulsen, Christian B
AU - Ranti, Juha
AU - Illmer, Thomas
AU - Schoettker, Bjoern
AU - Böttcher, Sebastian
AU - Gaska, Tobias
AU - Vandenberghe, Elisabeth
AU - Clifford, Ruth
AU - Benjamini, Ohad
AU - Frustaci, Anna Maria
AU - Scarfò, Lydia
AU - Sportoletti, Paolo
AU - Schreurs, John
AU - Levin, Mark-David
AU - van der Straaten, Hanneke
AU - van der Klift, Marjolein
AU - Tran, Hoa
AU - de la Serna, Javier
AU - Loscertales, Javier
AU - Lindblad, Oscar
AU - Bergendahl Sandstedt, Anna
AU - Goede, Jeroen
AU - Baumann, Michael
AU - Fink, Anna Maria
AU - Fischer, Kirsten
AU - Ritgen, Matthias
AU - Kreuzer, Karl-Anton
AU - Schneider, Christof
AU - Tausch, Eugen
AU - Stilgenbauer, Stephan
AU - Robrecht, Sandra
AU - Eichhorst, Barbara
AU - Hallek, Michael
AU - CLL17 Trial Investigators
N1 - Copyright © 2025 Massachusetts Medical Society.
PY - 2025/12/6
Y1 - 2025/12/6
N2 - BACKGROUND: Treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) currently consists of two main approaches - continuous therapy with Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors and fixed-duration regimens combining venetoclax with either CD20 antibodies or Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Comparisons of these two therapeutic approaches are lacking.METHODS: We conducted an investigator-initiated, phase 3, randomized trial involving patients with previously untreated CLL. Patients were randomly assigned to receive continuous ibrutinib or fixed-duration venetoclax-obinutuzumab or venetoclax-ibrutinib. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (noninferiority margin for the hazard ratio, 1.608, corresponding to a noninferiority margin of 8 percentage points at 3 years). Secondary end points included minimal residual disease (MRD), response, overall survival, and safety.RESULTS: A total of 909 patients were assigned to venetoclax-obinutuzumab (303 patients), venetoclax-ibrutinib (305 patients), or ibrutinib (301 patients). The median follow-up was 34.2 months. In this prespecified interim analysis, 3-year progression-free survival was 81.1% in the venetoclax-obinutuzumab group, 79.4% in the venetoclax-ibrutinib group, and 81.0% in the ibrutinib group (hazard ratio for venetoclax-obinutuzumab vs. ibrutinib, 0.87 [98.3% confidence interval {CI}, 0.54 to 1.41]; hazard ratio for venetoclax-ibrutinib vs. ibrutinib, 0.84 [98.0% CI, 0.53 to 1.32]); the results for each comparison met the criterion for noninferiority. After the end of treatment, MRD in peripheral blood was undetectable in 73.3% of the patients in the venetoclax-obinutuzumab group, 47.2% in the venetoclax-ibrutinib group, and 0% in the ibrutinib group. Three-year overall survival was 91.5%, 96.0%, and 95.7%, respectively. The most common adverse events were infections, gastrointestinal disorders, and cytopenias.CONCLUSIONS: In patients with previously untreated CLL, fixed-duration treatment with venetoclax-obinutuzumab or venetoclax-ibrutinib was noninferior to continuous ibrutinib with regard to investigator-assessed progression-free survival. (Funded by the University of Cologne and others; CLL17 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04608318; EudraCT number, 2019-003854-99.).
AB - BACKGROUND: Treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) currently consists of two main approaches - continuous therapy with Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors and fixed-duration regimens combining venetoclax with either CD20 antibodies or Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Comparisons of these two therapeutic approaches are lacking.METHODS: We conducted an investigator-initiated, phase 3, randomized trial involving patients with previously untreated CLL. Patients were randomly assigned to receive continuous ibrutinib or fixed-duration venetoclax-obinutuzumab or venetoclax-ibrutinib. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (noninferiority margin for the hazard ratio, 1.608, corresponding to a noninferiority margin of 8 percentage points at 3 years). Secondary end points included minimal residual disease (MRD), response, overall survival, and safety.RESULTS: A total of 909 patients were assigned to venetoclax-obinutuzumab (303 patients), venetoclax-ibrutinib (305 patients), or ibrutinib (301 patients). The median follow-up was 34.2 months. In this prespecified interim analysis, 3-year progression-free survival was 81.1% in the venetoclax-obinutuzumab group, 79.4% in the venetoclax-ibrutinib group, and 81.0% in the ibrutinib group (hazard ratio for venetoclax-obinutuzumab vs. ibrutinib, 0.87 [98.3% confidence interval {CI}, 0.54 to 1.41]; hazard ratio for venetoclax-ibrutinib vs. ibrutinib, 0.84 [98.0% CI, 0.53 to 1.32]); the results for each comparison met the criterion for noninferiority. After the end of treatment, MRD in peripheral blood was undetectable in 73.3% of the patients in the venetoclax-obinutuzumab group, 47.2% in the venetoclax-ibrutinib group, and 0% in the ibrutinib group. Three-year overall survival was 91.5%, 96.0%, and 95.7%, respectively. The most common adverse events were infections, gastrointestinal disorders, and cytopenias.CONCLUSIONS: In patients with previously untreated CLL, fixed-duration treatment with venetoclax-obinutuzumab or venetoclax-ibrutinib was noninferior to continuous ibrutinib with regard to investigator-assessed progression-free survival. (Funded by the University of Cologne and others; CLL17 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04608318; EudraCT number, 2019-003854-99.).
U2 - 10.1056/NEJMoa2515458
DO - 10.1056/NEJMoa2515458
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 41358601
SN - 0028-4793
JO - The New England journal of medicine
JF - The New England journal of medicine
ER -