Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Feasibility of a transition intervention aimed at adolescents with chronic illness

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Is HEADS in our heads? Health risk behavior is not routinely discussed with young people with chronic conditions

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Classmates motivate childhood cancer patients to participate in physical activity during treatment: A qualitative study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Psychotropic Medication Use in Parents of Children Diagnosed With Cancer

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Sperm DNA Integrity is Unaffected by Thiopurine Treatment in Men With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Insulin-dependent diabetes: A chronic complication to acute pancreatitis in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: International guidelines recommend planned and structured transition programmes for adolescents with chronic illness because inadequate transition may lead to poor disease control and risk of lacking outpatient follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility of a transition intervention aimed at adolescents with chronic illness focusing on declines, drop-outs, no-shows and advantages and disadvantages of participating.

METHODS: We invited 236 adolescents (12-20 years) with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) to participate in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) transition intervention. Reasons for decline and drop-outs were calculated. Adolescents' experiences of advantages and disadvantages of participating and reasons for no-shows were investigated through focus groups and telephone interviews, which were analysed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS: One hundred and twenty of the 236 eligible patients declined to participate in the intervention and 20% dropped out during the intervention. Unspecified declines and practical issues were the most common reason to decline, and 'do not wish to continue' was the most common reason to drop-out. Reasons for no-shows were forgetting and being too busy. Advantages of participating were stated as 'participating without parents', 'trust and confidentiality', 'being able to set the agenda' and 'responsiveness'. Disadvantages were 'unclear aim of the study', 'meeting others with JIA', 'too few conversations' and 'transport issues'.

CONCLUSIONS: Many adolescents had difficulties understanding the aim of the intervention. However, most participants appreciated the conversations about identity as well as the trust and confidentiality in the communication. In the future, adolescents should be offered more individually organised programmes according to their preferences and needs in cooperation with parents and health care providers.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftInternational Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health
Sider (fra-til)1-8
Antal sider8
ISSN0334-0139
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 14 okt. 2016

ID: 49876120