Feasibility and validity of the Actiheart Activity Monitor in children who were hospitalized with cancer coadmitted with classmates: a RESPECT study

Peter Schmidt-Andersen; Tom Møller; Pernille R Mogensen; Kjeld Schmiegelow; Hanne B Larsen; Martin K F Nielsen

doi:10.1097/PEP.0000000000000712

Feasibility and validity of the Actiheart Activity Monitor in children who were hospitalized with cancer coadmitted with classmates: a RESPECT study

Peter Schmidt-Andersen, Tom Møller, Pernille R Mogensen, Kjeld Schmiegelow, Hanne B Larsen, Martin K F Nielsen

4 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: We investigated the feasibility of the Actiheart monitor to determine total daily energy expenditure and the validity of the Actiheart step test as an accurate estimate of peak oxygen uptake.

METHODS: (Equation is included in full-text article.)O2 peak was estimated with the Actiheart step test and compared with a cardiopulmonary exercise test. Total daily energy expenditure was measured using the Actiheart monitor on days with and without classmate coadmission.

RESULTS: Of 26 eligible measurement periods (15 children), 89% participated and 91% could participate safely; however, 35% fulfilled demands for valid monitoring. The percentage of children not completing the monitoring period was 10% (attrition) and adherence to classmate visits was 84%. Forty-eight percent of the measurement periods provided data, and only 27% was calibrated data. Actiheart step test significantly overestimated (Equation is included in full-text article.)O2 peak compared with the Cardio Pulmonary Exercise Test.

CONCLUSION: Measuring total daily energy expenditure using Actiheart is not feasible, nor implementable in children with cancer. Furthermore, the Actiheart step test is not a valid test to estimate (Equation is included in full-text article.)O2 peak in children with cancer.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Tidsskrift	Pediatric physical therapy : the official publication of the Section on Pediatrics of the American Physical Therapy Association
Vol/bind	32
Udgave nummer	3
Sider (fra-til)	226-233
Antal sider	8
ISSN	0898-5669
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0000000000000712
Status	Udgivet - jul. 2020

Adgang til dokumentet

10.1097/PEP.0000000000000712

Citationsformater

Schmidt-Andersen, P., Møller, T., Mogensen, P. R., Schmiegelow, K., Larsen, H. B., & Nielsen, M. K. F. (2020). Feasibility and validity of the Actiheart Activity Monitor in children who were hospitalized with cancer coadmitted with classmates: a RESPECT study. Pediatric physical therapy : the official publication of the Section on Pediatrics of the American Physical Therapy Association, 32(3), 226-233. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0000000000000712

Feasibility and validity of the Actiheart Activity Monitor in children who were hospitalized with cancer coadmitted with classmates: a RESPECT study. / Schmidt-Andersen, Peter; Møller, Tom; Mogensen, Pernille R et al.
I: Pediatric physical therapy : the official publication of the Section on Pediatrics of the American Physical Therapy Association, Bind 32, Nr. 3, 07.2020, s. 226-233.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › peer review

Schmidt-Andersen, P, Møller, T, Mogensen, PR, Schmiegelow, K , Larsen, HB & Nielsen, MKF 2020, 'Feasibility and validity of the Actiheart Activity Monitor in children who were hospitalized with cancer coadmitted with classmates: a RESPECT study', Pediatric physical therapy : the official publication of the Section on Pediatrics of the American Physical Therapy Association, bind 32, nr. 3, s. 226-233. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0000000000000712

Schmidt-Andersen P, Møller T, Mogensen PR, Schmiegelow K , Larsen HB , Nielsen MKF. Feasibility and validity of the Actiheart Activity Monitor in children who were hospitalized with cancer coadmitted with classmates: a RESPECT study. Pediatric physical therapy : the official publication of the Section on Pediatrics of the American Physical Therapy Association. 2020 jul.;32(3):226-233. doi: 10.1097/PEP.0000000000000712

Schmidt-Andersen, Peter ; Møller, Tom ; Mogensen, Pernille R et al. / Feasibility and validity of the Actiheart Activity Monitor in children who were hospitalized with cancer coadmitted with classmates : a RESPECT study. I: Pediatric physical therapy : the official publication of the Section on Pediatrics of the American Physical Therapy Association. 2020 ; Bind 32, Nr. 3. s. 226-233.

@article{fa8152adf01c45aeb7b5bbdaae3612c8,

title = "Feasibility and validity of the Actiheart Activity Monitor in children who were hospitalized with cancer coadmitted with classmates: a RESPECT study",

abstract = "PURPOSE: We investigated the feasibility of the Actiheart monitor to determine total daily energy expenditure and the validity of the Actiheart step test as an accurate estimate of peak oxygen uptake.METHODS: (Equation is included in full-text article.)O2 peak was estimated with the Actiheart step test and compared with a cardiopulmonary exercise test. Total daily energy expenditure was measured using the Actiheart monitor on days with and without classmate coadmission.RESULTS: Of 26 eligible measurement periods (15 children), 89% participated and 91% could participate safely; however, 35% fulfilled demands for valid monitoring. The percentage of children not completing the monitoring period was 10% (attrition) and adherence to classmate visits was 84%. Forty-eight percent of the measurement periods provided data, and only 27% was calibrated data. Actiheart step test significantly overestimated (Equation is included in full-text article.)O2 peak compared with the Cardio Pulmonary Exercise Test.CONCLUSION: Measuring total daily energy expenditure using Actiheart is not feasible, nor implementable in children with cancer. Furthermore, the Actiheart step test is not a valid test to estimate (Equation is included in full-text article.)O2 peak in children with cancer.",

keywords = "Actiheart, cardiorespiratory fitness, children with cancer, feasibility, physical activity, validity",

author = "Peter Schmidt-Andersen and Tom M{\o}ller and Mogensen, {Pernille R} and Kjeld Schmiegelow and Larsen, {Hanne B} and Nielsen, {Martin K F}",

year = "2020",

month = jul,

doi = "10.1097/PEP.0000000000000712",

language = "English",

volume = "32",

pages = "226--233",

journal = "Pediatric physical therapy : the official publication of the Section on Pediatrics of the American Physical Therapy Association",

issn = "0898-5669",

publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Feasibility and validity of the Actiheart Activity Monitor in children who were hospitalized with cancer coadmitted with classmates

T2 - a RESPECT study

AU - Schmidt-Andersen, Peter

AU - Møller, Tom

AU - Mogensen, Pernille R

AU - Schmiegelow, Kjeld

AU - Larsen, Hanne B

AU - Nielsen, Martin K F

PY - 2020/7

Y1 - 2020/7

N2 - PURPOSE: We investigated the feasibility of the Actiheart monitor to determine total daily energy expenditure and the validity of the Actiheart step test as an accurate estimate of peak oxygen uptake.METHODS: (Equation is included in full-text article.)O2 peak was estimated with the Actiheart step test and compared with a cardiopulmonary exercise test. Total daily energy expenditure was measured using the Actiheart monitor on days with and without classmate coadmission.RESULTS: Of 26 eligible measurement periods (15 children), 89% participated and 91% could participate safely; however, 35% fulfilled demands for valid monitoring. The percentage of children not completing the monitoring period was 10% (attrition) and adherence to classmate visits was 84%. Forty-eight percent of the measurement periods provided data, and only 27% was calibrated data. Actiheart step test significantly overestimated (Equation is included in full-text article.)O2 peak compared with the Cardio Pulmonary Exercise Test.CONCLUSION: Measuring total daily energy expenditure using Actiheart is not feasible, nor implementable in children with cancer. Furthermore, the Actiheart step test is not a valid test to estimate (Equation is included in full-text article.)O2 peak in children with cancer.

AB - PURPOSE: We investigated the feasibility of the Actiheart monitor to determine total daily energy expenditure and the validity of the Actiheart step test as an accurate estimate of peak oxygen uptake.METHODS: (Equation is included in full-text article.)O2 peak was estimated with the Actiheart step test and compared with a cardiopulmonary exercise test. Total daily energy expenditure was measured using the Actiheart monitor on days with and without classmate coadmission.RESULTS: Of 26 eligible measurement periods (15 children), 89% participated and 91% could participate safely; however, 35% fulfilled demands for valid monitoring. The percentage of children not completing the monitoring period was 10% (attrition) and adherence to classmate visits was 84%. Forty-eight percent of the measurement periods provided data, and only 27% was calibrated data. Actiheart step test significantly overestimated (Equation is included in full-text article.)O2 peak compared with the Cardio Pulmonary Exercise Test.CONCLUSION: Measuring total daily energy expenditure using Actiheart is not feasible, nor implementable in children with cancer. Furthermore, the Actiheart step test is not a valid test to estimate (Equation is included in full-text article.)O2 peak in children with cancer.

KW - Actiheart

KW - cardiorespiratory fitness

KW - children with cancer

KW - feasibility

KW - physical activity

KW - validity

U2 - 10.1097/PEP.0000000000000712

DO - 10.1097/PEP.0000000000000712

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 32604366

SN - 0898-5669

VL - 32

SP - 226

EP - 233

JO - Pediatric physical therapy : the official publication of the Section on Pediatrics of the American Physical Therapy Association

JF - Pediatric physical therapy : the official publication of the Section on Pediatrics of the American Physical Therapy Association

IS - 3

ER -

Feasibility and validity of the Actiheart Activity Monitor in children who were hospitalized with cancer coadmitted with classmates: a RESPECT study

Abstract

Adgang til dokumentet

Fingeraftryk

Citationsformater