Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Fairness, fast and slow: A review of dual process models of fairness

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewpeer review

  1. Dimethyl Fumarate Treatment in Patients With Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Using MR elastography to assess portal hypertension and response to beta-blockers in patients with cirrhosis

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. No detectable effect on visual responses using functional MRI in a rodent model of α-synuclein expression

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Does pericentral mu-rhythm "power" corticomotor excitability? - a matter of EEG perspective

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

Fairness, the notion that people deserve or have rights to certain resources or kinds of treatment, is a fundamental dimension of moral cognition. Drawing on recent evidence from economics, psychology, and neuroscience, we ask whether self-interest is always intuitive, requiring self-control to override with reasoning-based fairness concerns, or whether fairness itself can be intuitive. While we find strong support for rejecting the notion that self-interest is always intuitive, the literature has reached conflicting conclusions about the neurocognitive systems underpinning fairness. We propose that this disagreement can largely be resolved in light of an extended Social Heuristics Hypothesis. Divergent findings may be attributed to the interpretation of behavioral effects of ego depletion or neurostimulation, reverse inference from brain activity to the underlying psychological process, and insensitivity to social context and inter-individual differences. To better dissect the neurobiological basis of fairness, we outline how future research should embrace cross-disciplinary methods that combine psychological manipulations with neuroimaging, and that can probe inter-individual, and cultural heterogeneities.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftNeuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Vol/bind89
Sider (fra-til)49-60
ISSN0149-7634
DOI
StatusUdgivet - jun. 2018

ID: 53366577