TY - JOUR
T1 - Factors affecting patient adherence to publicly funded colorectal cancer screening programmes
T2 - a systematic review
AU - Dressler, J
AU - Johnsen, A T
AU - Madsen, Laura Juul
AU - Rasmussen, M
AU - Jorgensen, L N
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Royal Society for Public Health
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/1
Y1 - 2021/1
N2 - OBJECTIVES: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer. Many countries in Europe have already implemented systematic screening programmes as per the recommendations by the European Union. The impact of screening is highly dependent on participation rates. The aim of the study was to identify barriers, facilitators and modifiers to participation in systematised, stool sample-based, publicly financed CRC screening programmes.STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review.METHODS: A systematic search in PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, Google Scholar and PsycINFO was undertaken. We included both qualitative and quantitative studies reporting on barriers and facilitators (excluding sociodemographic variables) to participation in stool sample-based CRC screening. Barriers and facilitators to participation were summarised and analysed.RESULTS: The inclusion criteria were met in 21 studies. Reported barriers and facilitators were categorised into the following seven themes (examples): psychology (fear of cancer), religion (believing cancer is the will of God), logistics (not knowing how to conduct the test), health-related factors (mental health), knowledge and awareness (lack of knowledge about the test), role of the general practitioner (being supported in taking the test by the general practitioner), and environmental factors (knowing someone who has participated in a screening programme). Six studies reported that non-participation was not due to a negative attitude towards screening for CRC.CONCLUSION: Many barriers to screening were found. It is important to work with peoples' fear of screening. Moreover, this review suggests that it might be possible to increase participation rates, if the population-wide awareness and knowledge of potential health benefits of CRC screening are increased and proper logistical support is provided.
AB - OBJECTIVES: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer. Many countries in Europe have already implemented systematic screening programmes as per the recommendations by the European Union. The impact of screening is highly dependent on participation rates. The aim of the study was to identify barriers, facilitators and modifiers to participation in systematised, stool sample-based, publicly financed CRC screening programmes.STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review.METHODS: A systematic search in PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, Google Scholar and PsycINFO was undertaken. We included both qualitative and quantitative studies reporting on barriers and facilitators (excluding sociodemographic variables) to participation in stool sample-based CRC screening. Barriers and facilitators to participation were summarised and analysed.RESULTS: The inclusion criteria were met in 21 studies. Reported barriers and facilitators were categorised into the following seven themes (examples): psychology (fear of cancer), religion (believing cancer is the will of God), logistics (not knowing how to conduct the test), health-related factors (mental health), knowledge and awareness (lack of knowledge about the test), role of the general practitioner (being supported in taking the test by the general practitioner), and environmental factors (knowing someone who has participated in a screening programme). Six studies reported that non-participation was not due to a negative attitude towards screening for CRC.CONCLUSION: Many barriers to screening were found. It is important to work with peoples' fear of screening. Moreover, this review suggests that it might be possible to increase participation rates, if the population-wide awareness and knowledge of potential health benefits of CRC screening are increased and proper logistical support is provided.
KW - Barriers
KW - Colorectal cancer
KW - Mixed methods
KW - Review
KW - Screening
KW - Stool sample
KW - Patient Participation/psychology
KW - Attitude to Health
KW - Humans
KW - Social Support
KW - Male
KW - Mental Health
KW - Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
KW - Practice Patterns, Physicians'
KW - Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis
KW - Fear
KW - Patient Compliance/psychology
KW - Patient Acceptance of Health Care
KW - Health Services Accessibility
KW - Mass Screening/psychology
KW - Early Detection of Cancer/psychology
KW - Female
KW - Intention
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85098233359&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.10.025
DO - 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.10.025
M3 - Review
C2 - 33360029
SN - 1741-3842
VL - 190
SP - 67
EP - 74
JO - Journal of Public Health
JF - Journal of Public Health
ER -