TY - JOUR
T1 - Eye hazard classification according to UN GHS / EU CLP and the severity of eye symptoms caused by accidental exposures to detergents and cleaning products
AU - Scazzola, Roberto
AU - Boeije, Geert
AU - Bøtker Pedersen, Ellen
AU - Brenneman, William
AU - Cagáňová, Blažena
AU - Celentano, Anna
AU - De Coninck, Els
AU - Desel, Herbert
AU - Ebbehøj, Niels
AU - Färber, Elke
AU - Sesana, Fabrizio
AU - Zacharov, Sergej
N1 - Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/7
Y1 - 2019/7
N2 - The use of lower cut-off values/concentration limits for the calculation of mixture classification in UN GHS/EU CLP versus the previous regulatory scheme (EU Dangerous Preparations Directive, DPD), has resulted in an increased number of classifications in the highest eye hazard category. Herein, a semi-quantitative categorisation of severity of eye effects, following accidental human exposures to detergents, was compared to the classification category of the products. Three schemes were evaluated: EU DPD; EU CLP (based on all available data and information, including weight of evidence); and EU CLP (based entirely on the calculation method). As reported by four EU Poison Centres, the vast majority of exposures had caused minor or no symptoms. Classification was a poor predictor of effects in man subjected to accidental exposure. Note however that this is also because effects are not only driven by the intrinsic hazard (as reflected in the classification), but also by the exposure conditions and mitigation (i.e. rinsing). EU CLP classification using all available data and information was more predictive of medically relevant symptoms than the EU CLP calculation method. The latter led to a poorer differentiation between irritating products versus products potentially causing serious eye damage.
AB - The use of lower cut-off values/concentration limits for the calculation of mixture classification in UN GHS/EU CLP versus the previous regulatory scheme (EU Dangerous Preparations Directive, DPD), has resulted in an increased number of classifications in the highest eye hazard category. Herein, a semi-quantitative categorisation of severity of eye effects, following accidental human exposures to detergents, was compared to the classification category of the products. Three schemes were evaluated: EU DPD; EU CLP (based on all available data and information, including weight of evidence); and EU CLP (based entirely on the calculation method). As reported by four EU Poison Centres, the vast majority of exposures had caused minor or no symptoms. Classification was a poor predictor of effects in man subjected to accidental exposure. Note however that this is also because effects are not only driven by the intrinsic hazard (as reflected in the classification), but also by the exposure conditions and mitigation (i.e. rinsing). EU CLP classification using all available data and information was more predictive of medically relevant symptoms than the EU CLP calculation method. The latter led to a poorer differentiation between irritating products versus products potentially causing serious eye damage.
KW - Animals
KW - Detergents/toxicity
KW - Eye Injuries/classification
KW - Humans
KW - Irritants/toxicity
KW - Poison Control Centers
KW - Trauma Severity Indices
KW - Poisoning severity score (PSS)
KW - EU CLP
KW - UN GHS
KW - Detergents and cleaning products
KW - EU DPD
KW - Accidental eye exposure
KW - Eye hazard classification category
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064178819&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.04.004
DO - 10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.04.004
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 30978367
SN - 0273-2300
VL - 105
SP - 69
EP - 76
JO - Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP
JF - Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP
ER -