Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Exploring the methods of data analysis in multifocal visual evoked potentials

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Functional-structural assessment of the optic pathways in patients with optic neuritis

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Electroretinography in healthy subjects in relation to systemic glucocorticoid intake

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Prevalence and histopathological signatures of optic disc drusen based on microscopy of 1713 enucleated eyes

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Identical Horner Syndrome in Homozygotic Twins Caused by Non-Traumatic Internal Carotid Artery Dissection

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. The Angioarchitecture of the Optic Nerve Head in Patients with Optic Disc Drusen

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. An ontological foundation for ocular phenotypes and rare eye diseases

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftLetterForskningpeer review

  5. The Influence of Volume and Anatomic Location of Optic Disc Drusen on the Sensitivity of Autofluorescence

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

PURPOSE: The multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) provides a topographical assessment of visual function, which has already shown potential for use in patients with glaucoma and multiple sclerosis. However, the variability in mfVEP measurements has limited its broader application. The purpose of this study was to compare several methods of data analysis to decrease mfVEP variability.

METHODS: Twenty-three normal subjects underwent mfVEP testing. Monocular and interocular asymmetry data were analyzed. Coefficients of variability in amplitude were examined using peak-to-peak, root mean square (RMS), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and logSNR techniques. Coefficients of variability in latency were examined using second peak and cross-correlation methods.

RESULTS: LogSNR and peak-to-peak methods had significantly lower intra-subject variability when compared with RMS and SNR methods. LogSNR had the lowest inter-subject amplitude variability when compared with peak-to-peak, RMS and SNR. Average latency asymmetry values for the cross-correlation analysis were 1.7 ms (CI 95 % 1.2-2.3 ms) and for the second peak analysis 2.5 ms (CI 95 % 1.7-3.3 ms). A significant difference was found between cross-correlation and second peak analysis for both intra-subject variability (p < 0.001) and inter-subject variability (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS: For a comparison of amplitude data between groups of patients, the logSNR or SNR methods are preferred because of the smaller inter-subject variability. LogSNR or peak-to-peak methods have lower intra-subject variability, so are recommended for comparing an individual mfVEP to previous published normative data. This study establishes that the choice of mfVEP data analysis method can be used to decrease variability of the mfVEP results.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftDocumenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology
Vol/bind133
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)41-8
Antal sider8
ISSN0012-4486
DOI
StatusUdgivet - aug. 2016

ID: 49838930