Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Evolution of heterogeneity (I2) estimates and their 95% confidence intervals in large meta-analyses

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Assessment of the sublingual microcirculation with the GlycoCheck system: Reproducibility and examination conditions

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Novel functions of the luteinizing hormone/chorionic gonadotropin receptor in prostate cancer cells and patients

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Hepatitis C prevalence in Denmark in 2016-An updated estimate using multiple national registers

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Inflammation, non-endothelial dependent coronary microvascular function and diastolic function-Are they linked?

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer
Assessment of heterogeneity is essential in systematic reviews and meta-analyses of clinical trials. The most commonly used heterogeneity measure, I(2), provides an estimate of the proportion of variability in a meta-analysis that is explained by differences between the included trials rather than by sampling error. Recent studies have raised concerns about the reliability of I(2) estimates, due to their dependence on the precision of included trials and time-dependent biases. Authors have also advocated use of 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to express the uncertainty associated with I(2) estimates. However, no previous studies have explored how many trials and events are required to ensure stable and reliable I(2) estimates, or how 95% CIs perform as evidence accumulates.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftP L o S One
Vol/bind7
Udgave nummer7
Sider (fra-til)e39471
ISSN1932-6203
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2012

ID: 36623744