Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Evaluation of a multimodal rehabilitative palliative care programme for patients with high-grade glioma and their family caregivers

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Family caregiver constructs and outcome measures in neuro-oncology: A systematic review

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  2. Decisional needs of patients with recurrent high-grade glioma and their families

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Family caregiver ambassador support for caregivers of patients with newly diagnosed hematological cancer: a feasibility study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: Patients diagnosed with high-grade glioma and their family caregivers often experience intense disease and treatment trajectories. Fluctuations in patient's symptoms lead to enormous burdens for caregivers and the risk of developing symptoms of stress, anxiety, and depression.

AIM: The study aim is to explore patient and caregiver experiences and evaluate the relevance of and satisfaction with a multimodal rehabilitative palliative care programme for patients diagnosed with a high-grade glioma and their family caregivers.

METHODS: In a longitudinal multi-methods study, adult patients with high-grade glioma (n = 17) and their family caregivers (n = 16) completed a 4-day residential programme and a 2-day follow-up programme 3 months later. Participants completed questionnaires after each programme, scoring relevance and satisfaction on a 5-point Likert scale. Qualitative data were collected during four evaluation group interviews with patients and caregivers.

RESULTS: The mean overall satisfaction score was 4.80 (standard deviation [SD], 0.55) for the initial 4-day programme and 4.28 (SD, 0.83) for the follow-up programme. Three themes emerged in the evaluation group interviews: (1) meeting peers strengthens social well-being, (2) the value of information and focusing on individual needs, and (3) accepting life as an unpredictable passage.

CONCLUSION: Participants found completing the REHPA-HGG programme feasible and rated all sessions highly for relevance and satisfaction. Qualitative findings confirm the value of individualised information, acceptance, and peer interactions.

IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE: A multimodal rehabilitative palliative care programme addressed unmet patient and caregiver needs. Peer-to-peer interventions for family caregivers may address individual support needs. Similar programmes may maximise benefit by avoiding planned behaviour changes and enhancing palliative approaches.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftScandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences
Vol/bind36
Udgave nummer3
Sider (fra-til)815-829
Antal sider15
ISSN0283-9318
DOI
StatusUdgivet - sep. 2022

ID: 67022171