Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital

European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) Certification of Theoretical and Practical Competences in Basic Vascular Ultrasound: Validity Investigation of the Assessment Tools

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review


  1. Endovascular Treatment of Chronic and Acute on Chronic Mesenteric Ischaemia: Results From a National Cohort of 245 Cases

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Simulation Based Training and Assessment in Open Vascular Surgery: A Systematic Review

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewpeer review

  3. Contemporary Treatment of Popliteal Artery Aneurysms in 14 Countries: A Vascunet Report

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Validation of an assessment tool for estimation of abdominal aortic aneurysm compression in diagnostic ultrasound

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Facilitators and Barriers for Young Medical Doctors Writing Their First Manuscript for Publication

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to gather validity evidence for the Assessment of basic Vascular Ultrasound Expertise (AVAUSE) tool, and to establish a pass/fail score for each component, to support decisions for certification.

METHODS: A cross sectional validation study performed during the European Society for Vascular Surgery's annual meeting. Validity evidence was sought for the theoretical test and two practical tests based on Messick's framework. The participants were vascular surgeons, vascular surgical trainees, sonographers, and nurses with varying experience levels. Five vascular ultrasound experts developed the theoretical and two practical test components of the AVAUSE tool for each test component. Two stations were set up for carotid examinations and two for superficial venous incompetence (SVI) examinations. Eight raters were assigned in pairs to each station. Three methods were used to set pass/fail scores: contrasting groups' method; rater consensus; and extended Angoff.

RESULTS: Nineteen participants were enrolled. Acceptable internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha) for the AVAUSE theoretical (0.93), carotid (0.84), and SVI (0.65) practical test were shown. In the carotid examination, inter-rater reliability (IRR) for the two rater pairs was good: 0.68 and 0.78, respectively. The carotid scores correlated significantly with years of experience (Pearson's r = 0.56, p = .013) but not with number of examinations in the last five years. For SVI, IRR was excellent at 0.81 and 0.87. SVI performance scores did not correlate with years of experience and number of examinations. The pass/fail score set by the contrasting groups' method was 29 points out of 50. The rater set pass/fail scores were 3.0 points for both carotid and SVI examinations and were used to determine successful participants. Ten of 19 participants passed the tests and were certified.

CONCLUSION: Validity evidence was sought and established for the AVAUSE comprehensive tool, including pass/fail standards. AVAUSE can be used to assess competences in basic vascular ultrasound, allowing operators to progress towards independent practice.

TidsskriftEuropean journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery
Udgave nummer6
Sider (fra-til)933-941
Antal sider9
StatusUdgivet - dec. 2020

Bibliografisk note

Copyright © 2020 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

ID: 61230530