TY - JOUR
T1 - EUCAST rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) in blood cultures
T2 - Validation in 55 european laboratories
AU - Åkerlund, Anna
AU - Jonasson, Emma
AU - Matuschek, Erika
AU - Serrander, Lena
AU - Sundqvist, Martin
AU - Kahlmeter, Gunnar
AU - Dzajic, Esad
AU - Agergaard, Charlotte Nielsen
AU - Pätäri-Sampo, Anu
AU - Manninen, Raija
AU - Grönroos, Juha O.
AU - Rasigade, Jean Philippe
AU - Salka, Waël
AU - Boyer, Pierre H.
AU - Lebessi, Evangelia
AU - Zapaniotis, Nikolaos
AU - Petinaki, Efi
AU - Spiliopoulou, Iris
AU - Kolonitsiou, Fevronia
AU - Helgason, Kristjan Orri
AU - Brazil, Jean
AU - Riccobono, Eleonora
AU - Lo Cascio, Giuliana
AU - Maccacaro, Laura
AU - Kolstad, Helge
AU - Haukeland, Torunn Sneide
AU - Kellokumpu, Pirkko Liisa
AU - Mjøen, Andreas Fossum
AU - Tofteland, Ståle
AU - Harbak, Berit
AU - Hartzen, Susanne Hartvig
AU - Hänsgen, Siri Haug
AU - Gammelsrud, Karianne Wiger
AU - Skolbekken, Unni
AU - Michalsen, Nina
AU - Brekken, Anita Løvås
AU - Pedersen, Bodil
AU - Guennigsman, Brian
AU - Lia, Astrid
AU - Berg, Ann Kristin
AU - Marco, Francesco
AU - Pitart, Cristina
AU - Egea, Pilar
AU - Cortes-Cuevas, Jose Luis
AU - Machuca, Jesus
AU - Wietzke, Martin
AU - Dammström, Magdalena
AU - Granström, Roger
AU - Corneliusson, Maria
AU - RAST Study Group
A2 - Hansen, Dennis Schrøder
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2020.
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/11/1
Y1 - 2020/11/1
N2 - Objectives: When bloodstream infections are caused by resistant bacteria, rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) is important for adjustment of therapy. The EUCAST RAST method, directly from positive blood cultures, was validated in a multi-laboratory study in Europe. Methods: RAST was performed in 40 laboratories in northern Europe (NE) and 15 in southern Europe (SE) from clinical blood cultures positive for Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus or Streptococcus pneumoniae. Categorical results at 4, 6 and 8 h of incubation were compared with results for EUCAST standard 16–20 h disc diffusion. The method, preliminary breakpoints and the performance of the laboratories were evaluated. Results: The total number of isolates was 833/318 in NE/SE. The number of zone diameters that could be read (88%, 96% and 99%) and interpreted (70%, 81% and 85%) increased with incubation time (4, 6 and 8 h). The categorical agreement was acceptable, with total error rates in NE/SE of 2.4%/4.9% at 4 h, 1.1%/3.5% at 6 h and 1.1%/3.3% at 8 h. False susceptibility at 4, 6 and 8 h of incubation was below 0.3% and 1.1% in NE and SE, respectively, and the corresponding percentages for false resistance were below 1.9% and 2.8%. After fine-tuning breakpoints, more zones could be interpreted (73%, 89% and 93%), with only marginally affected error rates. Conclusions: The EUCAST RAST method can be implemented in routine laboratories without major investments. It provides reliable antimicrobial susceptibility testing results for relevant bloodstream infection pathogens after 4–6 h of incubation.
AB - Objectives: When bloodstream infections are caused by resistant bacteria, rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) is important for adjustment of therapy. The EUCAST RAST method, directly from positive blood cultures, was validated in a multi-laboratory study in Europe. Methods: RAST was performed in 40 laboratories in northern Europe (NE) and 15 in southern Europe (SE) from clinical blood cultures positive for Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus or Streptococcus pneumoniae. Categorical results at 4, 6 and 8 h of incubation were compared with results for EUCAST standard 16–20 h disc diffusion. The method, preliminary breakpoints and the performance of the laboratories were evaluated. Results: The total number of isolates was 833/318 in NE/SE. The number of zone diameters that could be read (88%, 96% and 99%) and interpreted (70%, 81% and 85%) increased with incubation time (4, 6 and 8 h). The categorical agreement was acceptable, with total error rates in NE/SE of 2.4%/4.9% at 4 h, 1.1%/3.5% at 6 h and 1.1%/3.3% at 8 h. False susceptibility at 4, 6 and 8 h of incubation was below 0.3% and 1.1% in NE and SE, respectively, and the corresponding percentages for false resistance were below 1.9% and 2.8%. After fine-tuning breakpoints, more zones could be interpreted (73%, 89% and 93%), with only marginally affected error rates. Conclusions: The EUCAST RAST method can be implemented in routine laboratories without major investments. It provides reliable antimicrobial susceptibility testing results for relevant bloodstream infection pathogens after 4–6 h of incubation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85093539213&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/jac/dkaa333
DO - 10.1093/jac/dkaa333
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 32789506
AN - SCOPUS:85093539213
SN - 0305-7453
VL - 75
SP - 3230
EP - 3238
JO - Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
JF - Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
IS - 11
ER -