TY - JOUR
T1 - ERS Statement
T2 - a core outcome set for clinical trials evaluating the management of COPD exacerbations
AU - DECODE-NET
A2 - Mathioudakis, Alexander G
A2 - Abroug, Fekri
A2 - Agusti, Alvar
A2 - Ananth, Sachin
A2 - Bakke, Per
A2 - Bartziokas, Konstantinos
A2 - Beghe, Bianca
A2 - Bikov, Andras
A2 - Bradbury, Thomas
A2 - Brusselle, Guy
A2 - Cadus, Cordula
A2 - Coleman, Courtney
A2 - Contoli, Marco
A2 - Corlateanu, Alexandru
A2 - Corlateanu, Olga
A2 - Criner, Gerard J
A2 - Csoma, Balazs
A2 - Emelyanov, Alexander
A2 - Faner, Rosa
A2 - Fernandez Romero, Gustavo
A2 - Hammouda, Zeineb
A2 - Horváth, Peter
A2 - Huerta Garcia, Arturo
A2 - Jacobs, Michael
A2 - Jenkins, Christine
A2 - Joos, Guy
A2 - Kharevich, Olga
A2 - Kostikas, Konstantinos
A2 - Lapteva, Elena
A2 - Lazar, Zsofia
A2 - Leuppi, Joerg D
A2 - Liddle, Carol
A2 - Linnell, John
A2 - López-Giraldo, Alejandra
A2 - McDonald, Vanessa M
A2 - Nielsen, Rune
A2 - Papi, Alberto
A2 - Saraiva, Isabel
A2 - Sergeeva, Galina
A2 - Sioutkou, Agni
A2 - Sivapalan, Pradeesh
A2 - Stovold, Elizabeth
A2 - Wang, Hao
A2 - Wen, Fuqiang
A2 - Yorke, Janelle
A2 - Williamson, Paula R
A2 - Vestbo, Jørgen
A2 - Jensen, Jens-Ulrik
N1 - Copyright ©The authors 2021. For reproduction rights and permissions contact [email protected].
PY - 2022/5
Y1 - 2022/5
N2 - Clinical trials evaluating the management of acute exacerbations of COPD assess heterogeneous outcomes, often omitting those that are clinically relevant or more important to patients. We have developed a core outcome set, a consensus-based minimum set of important outcomes that we recommend are evaluated in all future clinical trials on exacerbations management, to improve their quality and comparability. COPD exacerbations outcomes were identified through methodological systematic reviews and qualitative interviews with 86 patients from 11 countries globally. The most critical outcomes were prioritised for inclusion in the core outcome set through a two-round Delphi survey completed by 1063 participants (256 patients, 488 health professionals and 319 clinical academics) from 88 countries in five continents. Two global, multi-stakeholder, virtual consensus meetings were conducted to 1) finalise the core outcome set and 2) prioritise a single measurement instrument to be used for evaluating each of the prioritised outcomes. Consensus was informed by rigorous methodological systematic reviews. The views of patients with COPD were accounted for at all stages of the project. Survival, treatment success, breathlessness, quality of life, activities of daily living, the need for a higher level of care, arterial blood gases, disease progression, future exacerbations and hospital admissions, treatment safety and adherence were all included in the core outcome set. Focused methodological research was recommended to further validate and optimise some of the selected measurement instruments. The panel did not consider the prioritised set of outcomes and associated measurement instruments to be burdensome for patients and health professionals to use.
AB - Clinical trials evaluating the management of acute exacerbations of COPD assess heterogeneous outcomes, often omitting those that are clinically relevant or more important to patients. We have developed a core outcome set, a consensus-based minimum set of important outcomes that we recommend are evaluated in all future clinical trials on exacerbations management, to improve their quality and comparability. COPD exacerbations outcomes were identified through methodological systematic reviews and qualitative interviews with 86 patients from 11 countries globally. The most critical outcomes were prioritised for inclusion in the core outcome set through a two-round Delphi survey completed by 1063 participants (256 patients, 488 health professionals and 319 clinical academics) from 88 countries in five continents. Two global, multi-stakeholder, virtual consensus meetings were conducted to 1) finalise the core outcome set and 2) prioritise a single measurement instrument to be used for evaluating each of the prioritised outcomes. Consensus was informed by rigorous methodological systematic reviews. The views of patients with COPD were accounted for at all stages of the project. Survival, treatment success, breathlessness, quality of life, activities of daily living, the need for a higher level of care, arterial blood gases, disease progression, future exacerbations and hospital admissions, treatment safety and adherence were all included in the core outcome set. Focused methodological research was recommended to further validate and optimise some of the selected measurement instruments. The panel did not consider the prioritised set of outcomes and associated measurement instruments to be burdensome for patients and health professionals to use.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85129973551&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1183/13993003.02006-2021
DO - 10.1183/13993003.02006-2021
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 34649975
SN - 0903-1936
VL - 59
JO - The European respiratory journal
JF - The European respiratory journal
IS - 5
M1 - 2102006
ER -