Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Enhanced recovery after abdominal wall reconstruction reduces length of postoperative stay: An observational cohort study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Alvimopan and outcome after colectomy?

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftLetterForskningpeer review

  2. Effect of transversus abdominis release on core stability: Short-term results from a single institution

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Are surgeons reluctant to accurately report intraoperative adverse events? A prospective study of 1,989 patients

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Differential recurrence after laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: importance of a nationwide registry-based mesh surveillance

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. A simple method to secure data-driven improvement of perioperative care

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Comment on "Epidural Analgesia (TEA) vs. IV-PCA After Open Liver Surgery"

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftKommentar/debatForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery has been shown to lead to improved postoperative outcomes after several surgical procedures. However, only a few studies have examined the application of enhanced recovery after surgery after abdominal wall reconstruction. The aim of the current observational cohort study was to evaluate the outcomes of enhanced recovery after surgery after abdominal wall reconstruction in a large cohort.

METHOD: This was a retrospective cohort study comparing patients undergoing abdominal wall reconstruction in a standard care pathway (control group) with patients undergoing abdominal wall reconstruction in an enhanced recovery after surgery pathway. Registered outcomes included 30-day postoperative complications, length of stay, and readmission rate.

RESULTS: A total of 190 patients undergoing abdominal wall reconstruction for large incisional hernias were included in the study, of which 96 were treated according to standard protocol, and 94 underwent enhanced recovery after surgery pathway. Length of stay was significantly reduced after the introduction of enhanced recovery after surgery (median 4, interquartile range 3-6 days vs. control 5, 4-7 days, P < .001). There was no difference between the cohorts in the incidence of postoperative complications requiring operative intervention (enhanced recovery after surgery 10.6% vs control 10.4%, P = 1.0) or the rate of readmissions (enhanced recovery after surgery 16.0% vs control 12.5%, P = .635).

CONCLUSION: Enhanced recovery after surgery is feasible after abdominal wall reconstruction, leading to reduced length of stay without increasing the rate of complications or readmissions. Enhanced recovery should be implemented as standard in centers performing abdominal wall reconstruction.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftSurgery
Vol/bind165
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)393-397
Antal sider5
ISSN0039-6060
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2019

ID: 55155959