TY - JOUR
T1 - Endometriosis and menopausal hormone therapy impact the hysterectomy-ovarian cancer association
AU - Khoja, Lilah
AU - Weber, Rachel Palmieri
AU - Webb, Penelope M
AU - Jordan, Susan J
AU - Muthukumar, Aruna
AU - Chang-Claude, Jenny
AU - Fortner, Renée T
AU - Jensen, Allan
AU - Kjaer, Susanne K
AU - Risch, Harvey
AU - Doherty, Jennifer Anne
AU - Harris, Holly R
AU - Goodman, Marc T
AU - Modugno, Francesmary
AU - Moysich, Kirsten
AU - Berchuck, Andrew
AU - Schildkraut, Joellen M
AU - Cramer, Daniel
AU - Terry, Kathryn L
AU - Anton-Culver, Hoda
AU - Ziogas, Argyrios
AU - Phung, Minh Tung
AU - Hanley, Gillian E
AU - Wu, Anna H
AU - Mukherjee, Bhramar
AU - McLean, Karen
AU - Cho, Kathleen
AU - Pike, Malcolm C
AU - Pearce, Celeste Leigh
AU - Lee, Alice W
AU - Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group
N1 - Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2022/1
Y1 - 2022/1
N2 - OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between hysterectomy and ovarian cancer, and to understand how hormone therapy (HT) use and endometriosis affect this association.METHODS: We conducted a pooled analysis of self-reported data from 11 case-control studies in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC). Women with (n = 5350) and without ovarian cancer (n = 7544) who never used HT or exclusively used either estrogen-only therapy (ET) or estrogen+progestin therapy (EPT) were included. Risk of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer adjusted for duration of ET and EPT use and stratified on history of endometriosis was determined using odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).RESULTS: Overall and among women without endometriosis, there was a positive association between ovarian cancer risk and hysterectomy (OR = 1.19, 95% CI 1.09-1.31 and OR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.09-1.32, respectively), but no association upon adjusting for duration of ET and EPT use (OR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.94-1.16 and OR = 1.06, 95% CI 0.95-1.18, respectively). Among women with a history of endometriosis, there was a slight inverse association between hysterectomy and ovarian cancer risk (OR = 0.93, 95% CI 0.69-1.26), but this association became stronger and statistically significant after adjusting for duration of ET and EPT use (OR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.48-0.99).CONCLUSIONS: The hysterectomy-ovarian cancer association is complex and cannot be understood without considering duration of ET and EPT use and history of endometriosis. Failure to take these exposures into account in prior studies casts doubt on their conclusions. Overall, hysterectomy is not risk-reducing for ovarian cancer, however the inverse association among women with endometriosis warrants further investigation.
AB - OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between hysterectomy and ovarian cancer, and to understand how hormone therapy (HT) use and endometriosis affect this association.METHODS: We conducted a pooled analysis of self-reported data from 11 case-control studies in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC). Women with (n = 5350) and without ovarian cancer (n = 7544) who never used HT or exclusively used either estrogen-only therapy (ET) or estrogen+progestin therapy (EPT) were included. Risk of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer adjusted for duration of ET and EPT use and stratified on history of endometriosis was determined using odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).RESULTS: Overall and among women without endometriosis, there was a positive association between ovarian cancer risk and hysterectomy (OR = 1.19, 95% CI 1.09-1.31 and OR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.09-1.32, respectively), but no association upon adjusting for duration of ET and EPT use (OR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.94-1.16 and OR = 1.06, 95% CI 0.95-1.18, respectively). Among women with a history of endometriosis, there was a slight inverse association between hysterectomy and ovarian cancer risk (OR = 0.93, 95% CI 0.69-1.26), but this association became stronger and statistically significant after adjusting for duration of ET and EPT use (OR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.48-0.99).CONCLUSIONS: The hysterectomy-ovarian cancer association is complex and cannot be understood without considering duration of ET and EPT use and history of endometriosis. Failure to take these exposures into account in prior studies casts doubt on their conclusions. Overall, hysterectomy is not risk-reducing for ovarian cancer, however the inverse association among women with endometriosis warrants further investigation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85119056083&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.10.088
DO - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.10.088
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 34776242
SN - 0090-8258
VL - 164
SP - 195
EP - 201
JO - Gynecologic Oncology
JF - Gynecologic Oncology
IS - 1
ER -