TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of colchicine for secondary prevention according to stroke subtype
T2 - A secondary analysis of the CONVINCE randomized trial
AU - Maes, Louise
AU - Walsh, Cathal
AU - Weimar, Christian
AU - Purroy, Francisco
AU - Price, Christopher
AU - Clarke, Brian
AU - Castro, Pedro
AU - Czlonkowska, Anna
AU - Cuadrado-Godia, Elisa
AU - Fischer, Urs
AU - Fonseca, Ana Catarina
AU - Hill, Michael D.
AU - Jatuzis, Dalius
AU - Kõrv, Janika
AU - Kruuse, Christina
AU - Mikulik, Robert
AU - Nederkoorn, Paul J.
AU - Sztriha, Laszlo
AU - Thieme, Marcus
AU - Kelly, Peter
AU - Lemmens, Robin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 World Stroke Organization
PY - 2025/12/2
Y1 - 2025/12/2
N2 - Background: The Colchicine for prevention of vascular inflammation in Non-CardioEmbolic stroke (CONVINCE) trial evaluated long-term treatment with colchicine for the prevention of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in a stroke population. Although the intention-to-treat analysis did not demonstrate a significant reduction in the primary endpoint, fewer outcome events were observed in the colchicine-treated group. It is unknown if a potential treatment effect is modified by ischemic stroke etiology. Aims: In this pre-specified secondary analysis, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of colchicine for prevention of MACE in patients with minor stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack (TIA) according to index event stroke etiology. Methods: A total of 3154 patients with recent non-cardioembolic stroke or TIA were randomly assigned to receive colchicine, 0.5 mg daily in addition to guideline-based usual care or usual care alone. The primary endpoint was a composite of first fatal or non-fatal recurrent ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, or hospitalization for unstable angina. Subgroups of patients with large-artery atherosclerosis, small-vessel disease, and cryptogenic stroke were evaluated. Results: A total of 3100 patients were included in the current analysis. The treatment effect did not vary across stroke subtype subgroups (p = 0.64 for interaction). In patients allocated to colchicine versus usual care alone, the primary endpoint occurred in 32 of 260 (12.3%) versus 42 of 263 (16%) patients with large-artery atherosclerosis (hazard ratio (HR), 0.77 (95% CI, 0.48–1.22)); 39 of 419 (9.3%) versus 47 of 435 (10.8%) patients with small-vessel occlusion (HR, 0.87 (95% CI, 0.57–1.34)); and 82 of 877 (9.4%) versus 92 of 846 (10.5%) patients with cryptogenic stroke (HR, 0.89 (95% CI, 0.66–1.12)). Conclusions: The direction of effect for prevention of recurrent MACE favored colchicine, consistent with randomized trials in coronary disease, regardless of stroke subtype. Future stroke trials should consider selecting patients with evidence of atherosclerosis irrespective of stroke subtype. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov
AB - Background: The Colchicine for prevention of vascular inflammation in Non-CardioEmbolic stroke (CONVINCE) trial evaluated long-term treatment with colchicine for the prevention of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in a stroke population. Although the intention-to-treat analysis did not demonstrate a significant reduction in the primary endpoint, fewer outcome events were observed in the colchicine-treated group. It is unknown if a potential treatment effect is modified by ischemic stroke etiology. Aims: In this pre-specified secondary analysis, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of colchicine for prevention of MACE in patients with minor stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack (TIA) according to index event stroke etiology. Methods: A total of 3154 patients with recent non-cardioembolic stroke or TIA were randomly assigned to receive colchicine, 0.5 mg daily in addition to guideline-based usual care or usual care alone. The primary endpoint was a composite of first fatal or non-fatal recurrent ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, or hospitalization for unstable angina. Subgroups of patients with large-artery atherosclerosis, small-vessel disease, and cryptogenic stroke were evaluated. Results: A total of 3100 patients were included in the current analysis. The treatment effect did not vary across stroke subtype subgroups (p = 0.64 for interaction). In patients allocated to colchicine versus usual care alone, the primary endpoint occurred in 32 of 260 (12.3%) versus 42 of 263 (16%) patients with large-artery atherosclerosis (hazard ratio (HR), 0.77 (95% CI, 0.48–1.22)); 39 of 419 (9.3%) versus 47 of 435 (10.8%) patients with small-vessel occlusion (HR, 0.87 (95% CI, 0.57–1.34)); and 82 of 877 (9.4%) versus 92 of 846 (10.5%) patients with cryptogenic stroke (HR, 0.89 (95% CI, 0.66–1.12)). Conclusions: The direction of effect for prevention of recurrent MACE favored colchicine, consistent with randomized trials in coronary disease, regardless of stroke subtype. Future stroke trials should consider selecting patients with evidence of atherosclerosis irrespective of stroke subtype. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov
KW - Colchicine
KW - secondary prevention
KW - stroke
KW - stroke subtype
KW - transient ischemic attack
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105026214632&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/17474930251406818
DO - 10.1177/17474930251406818
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 41328787
AN - SCOPUS:105026214632
SN - 1747-4930
JO - International Journal of Stroke
JF - International Journal of Stroke
ER -