Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Effect estimates in randomized trials and observational studies: comparing apples with apples

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Levels of and Changes in Childhood Body Mass Index in Relation to Risk of Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter in Adulthood

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Infertility in a Cohort of Male Danish Firefighters: A Register-Based Study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. ASSOCIATIONS OF OCCUPANT MOTOR VEHICLE CRASH WITH FUTURE HEART FAILURE AND ISCHEMIC STROKE IN OLDER ADULTS

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Mortality in women treated with assisted reproductive technology treatment - addressing the healthy patient effect

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  • Sara Lodi
  • Andrew Phillips
  • Jens Lundgren
  • Roger Logan
  • Shweta Sharma
  • Stephen R Cole
  • Abdel Babiker
  • Matthew Law
  • Haitao Chu
  • Dana Byrne
  • Andrzej Horban
  • Jonathan A C Sterne
  • Kholoud Porter
  • Caroline Sabin
  • Dominique Costagliola
  • Sophie Abgrall
  • John Gill
  • Giota Touloumi
  • Antonio G Pacheco
  • Ard van Sighem
  • Peter Reiss
  • Heiner C Bucher
  • Alexandra Montoliu Giménez
  • Inmaculada Jarrin
  • Linda Wittkop
  • Laurence Meyer
  • Santiago Perez-Hoyos
  • Amy Justice
  • James D Neaton
  • Miguel A Hernán
  • INSIGHT START Study Group and the HIV-CAUSAL Collaboration
Vis graf over relationer

Effect estimates from randomized trials and observational studies might not be directly comparable because of differences in study design, other than randomization, and in data analysis. We propose a 3-step procedure to facilitate meaningful comparisons of effect estimates from randomized trials and observational studies: 1) harmonization of the study protocols (eligibility criteria, treatment strategies, outcome, start and end of follow-up, causal contrast) so that the studies target the same causal effect, 2) harmonization of the data analysis to estimate the causal effect, and 3) sensitivity analyses to investigate the impact of discrepancies that could not be accounted for in the harmonization process. To illustrate our approach, we compared estimates of the effect of immediate with deferred initiation of antiretroviral therapy in individuals positive for the human immunodeficiency virus from the Strategic Timing of Antiretroviral Therapy (START) randomized trial and the observational HIV-CAUSAL Collaboration.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftAmerican Journal of Epidemiology
Vol/bind188
Udgave nummer8
Sider (fra-til)1569-1577
Antal sider9
ISSN0002-9262
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2019

Bibliografisk note

© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

ID: 57115856