Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Educational needs in the COVID-19 pandemic: a Delphi study among doctors and nurses in Wuhan, China

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Evaluation of competence in ultrasound-guided procedures-a generic assessment tool developed through the Delphi method

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Reliable test of clinicians' mastery in skin cancer diagnostics

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Training non-intensivist doctors to work with COVID-19 patients in intensive care units

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Learning Curves and Competences of Vascular Trainees Performing Open Aortic Repair in a Simulation-Based Environment

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  5. European Respiratory Society Statement on Thoracic Ultrasound

    Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportBidrag til bog/antologiForskning

Vis graf over relationer

OBJECTIVE: To identify theoretical and technical aspects regarding treatment, prevention of spread and protection of staff to inform the development of a comprehensive training curriculum on COVID-19 management.

DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.

SETTING: Nine hospitals caring for patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China.

PARTICIPANTS: 134 Chinese healthcare professionals (74 doctors and 60 nurses) who were deployed to Wuhan, China during the COVID-19 epidemic were included. A two-round Delphi process was initiated between March and May 2020. In the first round, the participants identified knowledge, technical and behavioural (ie, non-technical) skills that are needed to treat patients, prevent spread of the virus and protect healthcare workers. In round 2, the participants rated each item according to its importance to be included in a training curriculum on COVID-19. Consensus for inclusion in the final list was set at 80%.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Knowledge, technical and behavioural (ie, non-technical) skills that could form the basis of a training curriculum for COVID-19 management.

RESULTS: In the first round 1398 items were suggested by the doctors and reduced to 67 items after content analysis (treatment of patients: n=47; infection prevention and control: n=20). The nurses suggested 1193 items that were reduced to 70 items (treatment of patients: n=49; infection prevention and control: n=21). In round 2, the response rates were 82% in doctors and 93% in nurses. Fifty-eight items of knowledge, technical and behavioural skills were agreed on by the doctors to include in the final list. For the nurses, 58 items were agreed on.

CONCLUSIONS: This needs assessment process resulted in a comprehensive list of knowledge, technical and behavioural skills for COVID-19 management. Educators can use these to guide decisions regarding content of training curricula not only for COVID-19 management but also in preparation for future viral pandemic outbreaks.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftBMJ Open
Vol/bind11
Udgave nummer4
Sider (fra-til)e045940
ISSN2044-6055
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 9 apr. 2021

ID: 64954418