Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) did not improve responsiveness of patient-reported outcomes on quality of life

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Evidence-Based Research Series-Paper 1: What Evidence-Based Research is and why is it important?

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Using an Evidence-Based Research approach before a new study is conducted to ensure value

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. More than one-third of Cochrane reviews had gift authors, whereas ghost authorship was rare

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. The effect of dual-release versus conventional hydrocortisone on fatigue, measured by ecological momentary assessments

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. The renal extraction and the natriuretic action of GLP-1 in humans depend on interaction with the GLP-1 receptor

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Sex differences in acromegaly at diagnosis: A nationwide cohort study and meta-analysis of the literature

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Adrenal insufficiency in kidney transplant patients during low-dose prednisolone therapy: a cross-sectional case-control study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

OBJECTIVES: Clinical practice guidelines recommend questionnaires with short recall. We compare responsiveness of ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) and retrospective assessments of thyroid-related quality of life.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Patients with newly diagnosed thyrotoxicosis completed retrospective Thyroid-related Patient-Reported Outcome measures (ThyPROs) with 4-week and 1-week recall, respectively, and three daily EMAs for 4 weeks at time of inclusion and again after treatment (N = 115). Magnitude of change and statistical power (F-test statistics) were compared. Two designs were applied to the same data: Design 1 mimicked the practical realities of clinical trials by comparing 4-week recall ThyPRO administered at time of inclusion with EMA initiated at time of inclusion and collected prospectively for 1 week, thus not covering the same time frame or duration. Design 2 compared assessments covering the same 4 weeks after inclusion.

RESULTS: Design 1: the estimated change and statistical power were significantly larger for 4-week ThyPRO compared with EMAs. Design 2: retrospective assessments and EMAs had comparable change and power. Repeated 1-week ThyPRO administrations increased the statistical power.

CONCLUSION: Selecting the optimal time frame for evaluation proved crucial for responsiveness. EMAs did not provide higher responsiveness than retrospective measures in either design. Repeated 1-week ThyPRO administrations increased statistical power.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Vol/bind125
Sider (fra-til)138-147
Antal sider10
ISSN0895-4356
DOI
StatusUdgivet - sep. 2020

Bibliografisk note

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

ID: 60793654