Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Echocardiographic subtypes of heart failure in consecutive hospitalised patients with dyspnoea

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Associations between common ECG abnormalities and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Prevalence of early stages of heart failure in an elderly risk population: the Copenhagen Heart Failure Risk Study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Coronary risk stratification of patients with newly diagnosed heart failure

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Early follow-up after open heart valve surgery reduces healthcare costs: a propensity matched study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Regional variation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: incidence and survival - a nationwide study of regions in Denmark

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Genome-wide association and Mendelian randomisation analysis provide insights into the pathogenesis of heart failure

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Time in therapeutic range and risk of thromboembolism and bleeding in patients with a mechanical heart valve prosthesis

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) involves half of hospitalised patients with heart failure (HF), but estimates vary due to unclear diagnostic criteria. We performed a prospective observational study of hospitalised patients admitted with dyspnoea. The aim was to apply contemporary guidelines to diagnose HF due to valvular disease (HFvhd), HF due to reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), HF due to midrange EF (HFmrEF) and HFpEF in relation to presumed cardiac or non-cardiac dyspnoea.

Methods: We included consecutive hospitalised patients with presumed HF or dyspnoea and excluded patients with acute coronary syndrome, estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73 m² or low NT-proBNP (<296 ng/L). Higher age-adjusted NT-proBNP values excluded patients with presumptive non-cardiac dyspnoea. Contemporary criteria for HFpEF and diastolic dysfunction were assessed, and we adjudicated whether acute decompensated HF (ADHF) had been the primary diagnosis.

Results: Of 707 eligible patients, we included 370 patients of whom 75 had non-cardiac dyspnoea. Of these, 10% (38/370) had no cardiac dysfunction. Cardiac dysfunction consisted of 18.4%, HFvhd, 30.1% HFrEF, 10.2% HFmrEF and 41.3% HFpEF. HFpEF was twice as common in presumptive non-cardiac dyspnoea versus cardiac dyspnoea (71% vs 34%, p<0.0001). However, adjudicated ADHF was the primary diagnosis in 80% of HFrEF, 62% of HFmrEF and just 28% of HFpEF.

Conclusion: HF according to contemporary criteria applied to 90% of patients admitted with dyspnoea and elevated NT-proBNP irrespective of the presumptive cause of dyspnoea, of whom 10% had HFmrEF and 41% HFpEF. However, significant non-cardiac diagnoses related to 9 out of 10 with HFpEF with pulmonary disease as the predominant adjudicated problem.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftOpen Heart
Vol/bind6
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)e000928
ISSN2053-3624
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2019

ID: 58251872