Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Early goal-directed nutrition versus standard of care in adult intensive care patients: the single-centre, randomised, outcome assessor-blinded EAT-ICU trial

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Heterogeneity of treatment effect of prophylactic pantoprazole in adult ICU patients: a post hoc analysis of the SUP-ICU trial

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Noninvasive respiratory support in the hypoxaemic peri-operative/periprocedural patient: a joint ESA/ESICM guideline

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Diagnosis of severe respiratory infections in immunocompromised patients

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Oxygen toxicity in major emergency surgery-anything new?

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  5. Expert statement on the ICU management of patients with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Response

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. The handling oxygenation targets in the intensive care unit (HOT-ICU) trial: Detailed statistical analysis plan

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19) associated with severe acute pancreatitis: Case report on three family members

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

PURPOSE: We assessed the effects of early goal-directed nutrition (EGDN) vs. standard nutritional care in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients.

METHODS: We randomised acutely admitted, mechanically ventilated ICU patients expected to stay longer than 3 days in the ICU. In the EGDN group we estimated nutritional requirements by indirect calorimetry and 24-h urinary urea aiming at covering 100% of requirements from the first full trial day using enteral and parenteral nutrition. In the standard of care group we aimed at providing 25 kcal/kg/day by enteral nutrition. If this was not met by day 7, patients were supplemented with parenteral nutrition. The primary outcome was physical component summary (PCS) score of SF-36 at 6 months. We performed multiple imputation for data of the non-responders.

RESULTS: We randomised 203 patients and included 199 in the intention-to-treat analyses; baseline variables were reasonably balanced between the two groups. The EGDN group had less negative energy (p < 0.001) and protein (p < 0.001) balances in the ICU as compared to the standard of care group. The PCS score at 6 months did not differ between the two groups (mean difference 0.0, 95% CI -5.9 to 5.8, p = 0.99); neither did mortality, rates of organ failures, serious adverse reactions or infections in the ICU, length of ICU or hospital stay, or days alive without life support at 90 days.

CONCLUSIONS: EGDN did not appear to affect physical quality of life at 6 months or other important outcomes as compared to standard nutrition care in acutely admitted, mechanically ventilated, adult ICU patients. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier no. NCT01372176.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftIntensive Care Medicine
Vol/bind43
Udgave nummer11
Sider (fra-til)1637-1647
Antal sider11
ISSN0342-4642
DOI
StatusUdgivet - nov. 2017

ID: 52790237