Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

EANM perspective

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. RADIATION PROTECTION OF LINAC BUNKERS. A USER-FRIENDLY APPROACH

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Effect of altitude on solar UVR and spectral and spatial variations of UV irradiances measured inWagrain, Austria in winter

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Radiation exposure for medical staff performing quantitative coronary perfusion PET with 13N-ammonia

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Ruptured human Achilles tendon has elevated metabolic activity up to 1 year after repair

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. EANM procedural guidelines for radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging with SPECT and SPECT/CT: 2015 revision

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Somatosensory input and oromandibular dystonia

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer
Two scientific committees (physics & dosimetry) of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) commented on the draft 'Radiation Protection 162: radiation criteria for acceptability of radiological equipment used in diagnostic radiology, nuclear medicine and radiotherapy' (RP 162). This document updates and extends the acceptability criteria mentioned in 'Radiation Protection 91' and is an important means to further improve the quality of medical procedures involving ionising radiation. While the EANM committees support the presented framework as described in the introductory chapter, they have suggested substantial changes to the specific suspension levels for nuclear medicine equipment. During the revision process, an agreed consensus position was reached. The EANM considers RP 162 a significant improvement of RP 91 and endorses the document.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftRadiation Protection Dosimetry
Vol/bind153
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)166-9
Antal sider4
ISSN0144-8420
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2013

ID: 36851640