Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital

Dysphagia in Intensive Care Evaluation (DICE): An International Cross-Sectional Survey

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review


  1. Swallowing Exercise During Head and Neck Cancer Treatment: Results of a Randomized Trial

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Recognizing the Importance of Dysphagia: Stumbling Blocks and Stepping Stones in the Twenty-First Century

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftLederForskningpeer review

  3. Recognizing the importance of dysphaia: Stumbling blocks and stepping stones in the twenty-first century

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. The Prevalence of Oropharyngeal Dysphagia in Danish Patients Hospitalised with Community-Acquired Pneumonia

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  • Peter E Spronk
  • Laura E J Spronk
  • Ingrid Egerod
  • Jennifer McGaughey
  • Jackie McRae
  • Louise Rose
  • Martin B Brodsky
  • DICE study investigators
Vis graf over relationer

Dysphagia occurs commonly in the intensive care unit (ICU). Despite the clinical relevance, there is little worldwide research on prevention, assessment, evaluation, and/or treatment of dysphagia for ICU patients. We aimed to gain insight into this international knowledge gap. We conducted a multi-center, international online cross-sectional survey of adult ICUs. Local survey distribution champions were recruited through professional and personal networks. The survey was administered from November 2017 to June 2019 with three emails and a final telephone reminder. Responses were received from 746 ICUs (26 countries). In patients intubated > 48 h, 17% expected a > 50% chance that dysphagia would develop. This proportion increased to 43% in patients intubated > 7 days, and to 52% in tracheotomized patients. Speech-language pathologist (SLP) consultation was available in 66% of ICUs, only 4% reported a dedicated SLP. Although 66% considered a routine post-extubation dysphagia protocol important, most (67%) did not have a protocol. Few ICUs routinely assessed for dysphagia after 48 h of intubation (30%) or tracheostomy (41%). A large proportion (46%) used water swallow screening tests to determine aspiration, few (8%) used instrumental assessments (i.e., flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing). Swallowing exercises were used for dysphagia management by 30% of ICUs. There seems to be limited awareness among ICU practitioners that patients are at risk of dysphagia, particularly as ventilation persists, protocols, routine assessment, and instrumental assessments are generally not used. We recommend the development of a research agenda to increase the quality of evidence and ameliorate the implementation of evidence-based dysphagia protocols by dedicated SLPs.

Udgave nummer6
Sider (fra-til)1451-1460
Antal sider10
StatusUdgivet - dec. 2022

Bibliografisk note

© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

ID: 73778707