TY - JOUR
T1 - Dynamic control of the lumbopelvic complex; lack of reliability of established test procedures
AU - Henriksen, Marius
AU - Lund, Hans
AU - Bliddal, Henning
AU - Danneskiold-Samsøe, Bente
PY - 2007/6
Y1 - 2007/6
N2 - Impairment of the dynamic control of the lumbopelvic complex in LBP has gained increased focus both clinically and experimentally. The objectives of this study were to determine the reliability of inclinometry as a measure of dynamic lumbopelvic control. Lumbopelvic reposition accuracy during pelvic tilts was measured in 39 healthy subjects using an inclinometer attached to the skin at S2 level. The reposition accuracy was measured in sitting, standing and supported standing. Tests were performed three times with a 20 min recess between tests. Only data from the last two test sequences were used in order to account for learning effects. Intraclass correlation coefficients were low for the sitting (0.54) and supported standing positions (0.36). In the standing position, a significant difference between test and retest was observed (P = 0.003) and further reliability analysis was therefore abandoned. It is concluded that inclinometry is not reliable for measuring the dynamic lumbopelvic control in any of the test positions and prior work utilising inclinometry to evaluate dynamic lumbopelvic control should be interpreted with caution.
AB - Impairment of the dynamic control of the lumbopelvic complex in LBP has gained increased focus both clinically and experimentally. The objectives of this study were to determine the reliability of inclinometry as a measure of dynamic lumbopelvic control. Lumbopelvic reposition accuracy during pelvic tilts was measured in 39 healthy subjects using an inclinometer attached to the skin at S2 level. The reposition accuracy was measured in sitting, standing and supported standing. Tests were performed three times with a 20 min recess between tests. Only data from the last two test sequences were used in order to account for learning effects. Intraclass correlation coefficients were low for the sitting (0.54) and supported standing positions (0.36). In the standing position, a significant difference between test and retest was observed (P = 0.003) and further reliability analysis was therefore abandoned. It is concluded that inclinometry is not reliable for measuring the dynamic lumbopelvic control in any of the test positions and prior work utilising inclinometry to evaluate dynamic lumbopelvic control should be interpreted with caution.
KW - Adult
KW - Confidence Intervals
KW - Demography
KW - Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Lumbosacral Region
KW - Male
KW - Posture
KW - Range of Motion, Articular
KW - Reproducibility of Results
U2 - 10.1007/s00586-006-0198-5
DO - 10.1007/s00586-006-0198-5
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 16957945
SN - 0940-6719
VL - 16
SP - 733
EP - 740
JO - European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society
JF - European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society
IS - 6
ER -