Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Driving following defibrillator implantation: a nationwide register-linked survey study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Importance of smoking cessation for cardiovascular risk reduction

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Day-to-day measurement of physical activity and risk of atrial fibrillation

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  5. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

AIMS: Patients are restricted from driving following implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation or shock. We sought to investigate how many patients are aware of, and adhere to, the driving restrictions, and what proportion experience an ICD shock or other cardiac symptoms while driving.

METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a nationwide survey of all living Danish residents 18 years or older who received a first-time ICD between 2013 and 2016 (n = 3913) and linked their responses with nationwide registers. Of 2741 respondents (47% primary prevention, 83% male, median age 67 years), 2513 (92%) held a valid driver's license at ICD implantation, 175 (7%) of whom had a license for professional driving. Many drivers were unaware of driving restrictions: primary prevention 58%; secondary prevention 36%; post-appropriate shock 28%; professional drivers 55%. Almost all (94%) resumed non-professional driving after ICD implantation, more than one-third during the restricted period; 35% resumed professional driving. During a median follow-up of 2.3 years, 5 (0.2%) reported receiving an ICD shock while driving, one of which resulted in a traffic accident. The estimated risk of harm was 0.0002% per person-year.

CONCLUSION: In this nationwide study, many ICD patients were unaware of driving restrictions, and more than one third resumed driving during a driving restriction period. However, the rate of reported ICD shocks while driving was very low.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftEuropean Heart Journal
Vol/bind42
Udgave nummer35
Sider (fra-til)3529-3537
Antal sider9
ISSN0195-668X
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 14 sep. 2021

Bibliografisk note

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2021. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

ID: 67986787