Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Does patency after a vein collar and PTFE-bypass depend on sex and age? Re-analysis of a randomised trial

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Mitochondrial dysfunction in calf muscles of patients with combined peripheral arterial disease and diabetes type 2

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Deep venous thrombosis of the upper extremity. A review

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. The vein collar: an anastomotic servant or a patency promoter? Re-analysis of a randomized trial

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Micro-Lightguide Spectrophotometry (O2C) for Lower Limb Perfusion: Effects of Exercise Walking in Claudicants

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Endovascular aortic repair reduces gluteal oxygenation

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Assessment of EVAR Competence: Validity of a Novel Rating Scale (EVARATE) in a Simulated Setting

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Assessment of Competence in EVAR Procedures: A Novel Rating Scale Developed by the Delphi Technique

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  5. Assessment of Competence in EVAR Stent Graft Sizing and Selection

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer
Randomized studies evaluating the effect of a vein collar at the distal anastomosis of PTFE-grafts show conflicting results. The study of the Joint Vascular Research Group (JVRG) of UK found improved primary patency while the Scandinavian Miller Collar Study (SCAMICOS) found neither any effect on patency nor on limb salvage after bypass to below-knee arteries. However, the Scandinavian patients were a decade older and predominately female compared to the British patients. Can this explain the conflicting result?
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftInternational Angiology
Vol/bind31
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)156-62
Antal sider7
ISSN0392-9590
StatusUdgivet - 2012

ID: 36783789