Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Do callers to out-of-hours care misuse an option to jump the phone queue?

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Giving callers the option to bypass the telephone waiting line in out-of-hours services: a comparative intervention study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Diagnosing depression in primary care: a Rasch analysis of the major depression inventory

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Contact to the out-of-hours service among Danish parents of small children - a qualitative interview study

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Clinical accuracy of point-of-care urine culture in general practice

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

Objectives: Out-of-hours (OOH) services provide access to healthcare outside normal office hours, but the waiting time can sometimes be long. All callers must wait in the telephone queue, even if the health problem is urgent or life-threatening. We tested an emergency access button (EAB), which allowed callers with perceived severe health problems to bypass the queue. We aimed to investigate the severity of the health problems and the relevance of EAB use (assessed by triage professionals). Additionally, we aimed to calculate the number of suspected acute myocardial infarctions (AMI) and ambulance dispatches. Design: Descriptive study of a randomized intervention. Setting: OOH services in two major Danish healthcare regions. Subjects: 217,510 callers participated; 146,355 were randomized to intervention, and 6554 of 6631 (98.8%) questionnaires were completed by OOH triage professionals. Intervention: An EAB allowing randomly selected callers to bypass the telephone queue. Main outcome measures: Severity of contact and relevance of EAB use. Number of suspected AMIs and ambulance dispatches. Results: In both settings, contacts with EAB use concerned significantly more severe health problems than contacts without EAB use (p < 0.001). Triage professionals rated EAB use as "not relevant" in 23% of cases. Significantly more EAB users (10.4%) than EAB non-users (3.3% with EAB option and 1.7% without EAB option, p < 0.001) had a suspected AMI. Conclusions: We found higher proportions of severe health problems, suspected AMIs, and ambulance dispatches among EAB users. Only 23% of EAB use was rated "not relevant". This suggests that the EAB is used as intended. Key points Out-of-hours healthcare is challenged by increasing demand and long triage waiting times. An emergency access button may allow severely ill callers to jump the queue. Callers who bypassed the queue were more severely ill than callers who did not bypass the queue. Only 23% of bypassers presented "not relevant" health problems according to the triage staff.Trial registration: Identifier NCT02572115 registered at Clinicaltrials.gov on 5 October 2015.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftScandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care
Vol/bind37
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)207-217
Antal sider11
ISSN0281-3432
DOI
StatusUdgivet - jun. 2019

ID: 57272893