Forskning
Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital
Udgivet

Direct Observation vs. Video-Based Assessment in Flexible Cystoscopy

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  1. Nonspecialist Raters Can Provide Reliable Assessments of Procedural Skills

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Evaluation of Procedural Simulation as a Training and Assessment Tool in General Surgery-Simulating a Laparoscopic Appendectomy

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  3. Noticeable Variations in the Educational Exposure During Residency in Danish Orthopedic Departments

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. Ensuring Competency of Novice Laparoscopic Surgeons-Exploring Standard Setting Methods and their Consequences

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  5. Training and Assessment of Hysteroscopic Skills: A Systematic Review

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  1. Point-of-care ultrasound for general practitioners: a systematic needs assessment

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Simulation-based training for flexible cystoscopy - A randomized trial comparing two approaches

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

OBJECTIVE: Direct observation in assessment of clinical skills is prone to bias, demands the observer to be present at a certain location at a specific time, and is time-consuming. Video-based assessment could remove the risk of bias, increase flexibility, and reduce the time spent on assessment. This study investigated if video-based assessment was a reliable tool for cystoscopy and if direct observers were prone to bias compared with video-raters.

DESIGN: This study was a blinded observational trial. Twenty medical students and 9 urologists were recorded during 2 cystoscopies and rated by a direct observer and subsequently by 2 blinded video-raters on a global rating scale (GRS) for cystoscopy. Both intrarater and interrater reliability were explored. Furthermore, direct observer bias was explored by a paired samples t-test.

RESULTS: Intrarater reliability calculated by Pearson's r was 0.86. Interrater reliability was 0.74 for single measure and 0.85 for average measures. A hawk-dove effect was seen between the 2 raters. Direct observer bias was detected when comparing direct observer scores to the assessment by an independent video-rater (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION: This study found that video-based assessment was a reliable tool for cystoscopy with 2 video-raters. There was a significant bias when comparing direct observation with blinded video-based assessment.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of Surgical Education
Vol/bind75
Udgave nummer3
Sider (fra-til)671-677
ISSN1931-7204
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2018

ID: 52698767