TY - JOUR
T1 - Digital cognitive-behavioural therapy to reduce suicidal ideation and behaviours
T2 - a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data
AU - Büscher, Rebekka
AU - Beisemann, Marie
AU - Doebler, Philipp
AU - Micklitz, Hannah M
AU - Kerkhof, Ad
AU - Cuijpers, Pim
AU - Batterham, Philip J
AU - Calear, Alison L
AU - Christensen, Helen
AU - De Jaegere, Eva
AU - Domhardt, Matthias
AU - Erlangsen, Annette
AU - Eylem van Bergeijk, Ozlem
AU - Hill, Ryan
AU - Lungu, Anita
AU - Mühlmann, Charlotte
AU - Pettit, Jeremy W
AU - Portzky, Gwendolyn
AU - Steubl, Lena S
AU - van Spijker, Bregje A J
AU - Tighe, Joseph
AU - Werner-Seidler, Aliza
AU - Wilks, Chelsey R
AU - Sander, Lasse B
N1 - © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - QUESTION: Digital interventions based on cognitive-behavioural therapy (iCBT) is associated with reductions in suicidal ideation. However, fine-grained analyses of effects and potential effect-moderating variables are missing. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of iCBT on suicidal ideation, effect moderators, effects on suicide attempts and predictors of adherence.STUDY SELECTION AND ANALYSIS: We systematically searched CENTRAL, PsycINFO, Embase and PubMed for randomised controlled trials that investigated iCBT for suicidal ideation or behaviours. Participants reporting baseline suicidal ideation were eligible. We conducted a one-stage individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis. Suicidal ideation was the primary outcome, analysed as three indices: severity of suicidal ideation, reliable changes and treatment response.FINDINGS: We included IPD from nine out of ten eligible trials (2037 participants). iCBT showed significant reductions of suicidal ideation compared with control conditions across all indices (severity: b=-0.247, 95% CI -0.322 to -0.173; reliable changes: b=0.633, 95% CI 0.408 to 0.859; treatment response: b=0.606, 95% CI 0.410 to 0.801). In iCBT, the rate of reliable improvement was 40.5% (controls: 27.3%); the deterioration rate was 2.8% (controls: 5.1%). No participant-level moderator effects were identified. The effects on treatment response were higher for trials with waitlist-controls compared with active controls. There were insufficient data on suicide attempts. Human support and female gender predicted treatment adherence. The main source of potential bias was missing outcome data.CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence indicates that iCBT is effective in reducing suicidal ideation irrespective of age, gender and previous suicide attempts. Future studies should rigorously assess suicidal behaviour and drop-out reasons.
AB - QUESTION: Digital interventions based on cognitive-behavioural therapy (iCBT) is associated with reductions in suicidal ideation. However, fine-grained analyses of effects and potential effect-moderating variables are missing. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of iCBT on suicidal ideation, effect moderators, effects on suicide attempts and predictors of adherence.STUDY SELECTION AND ANALYSIS: We systematically searched CENTRAL, PsycINFO, Embase and PubMed for randomised controlled trials that investigated iCBT for suicidal ideation or behaviours. Participants reporting baseline suicidal ideation were eligible. We conducted a one-stage individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis. Suicidal ideation was the primary outcome, analysed as three indices: severity of suicidal ideation, reliable changes and treatment response.FINDINGS: We included IPD from nine out of ten eligible trials (2037 participants). iCBT showed significant reductions of suicidal ideation compared with control conditions across all indices (severity: b=-0.247, 95% CI -0.322 to -0.173; reliable changes: b=0.633, 95% CI 0.408 to 0.859; treatment response: b=0.606, 95% CI 0.410 to 0.801). In iCBT, the rate of reliable improvement was 40.5% (controls: 27.3%); the deterioration rate was 2.8% (controls: 5.1%). No participant-level moderator effects were identified. The effects on treatment response were higher for trials with waitlist-controls compared with active controls. There were insufficient data on suicide attempts. Human support and female gender predicted treatment adherence. The main source of potential bias was missing outcome data.CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence indicates that iCBT is effective in reducing suicidal ideation irrespective of age, gender and previous suicide attempts. Future studies should rigorously assess suicidal behaviour and drop-out reasons.
KW - Humans
KW - Female
KW - Suicidal Ideation
KW - Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
KW - Suicide, Attempted
KW - child & adolescent psychiatry
KW - adult psychiatry
KW - suicide & self-harm
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85144328590&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/ebmental-2022-300540
DO - 10.1136/ebmental-2022-300540
M3 - Review
C2 - 36535686
SN - 1362-0347
VL - 25
SP - e8-e17
JO - Evidence-Based Mental Health
JF - Evidence-Based Mental Health
IS - E1
ER -