Udskriv Udskriv
Switch language
Region Hovedstaden - en del af Københavns Universitetshospital

Did evolution create a flexible ligand-binding cavity in the urokinase receptor through deletion of a plesiotypic disulfide bond?

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review


  1. Chylomicronemia From GPIHBP1 Autoantibodies Successfully Treated With Rituximab: A Case Report

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  2. Chylomicronemia from GPIHBP1 autoantibodies

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

  3. Disorder in a two-domain neuronal Ca2+-binding protein regulates domain stability and dynamics using ligand mimicry

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  4. ANGPTL4 inactivates lipoprotein lipase by catalyzing the irreversible unfolding of LPL's hydrolase domain

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftLederForskningpeer review

  5. The structural basis for monoclonal antibody 5D2 binding to the tryptophan-rich loop of lipoprotein lipase

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Vis graf over relationer

The urokinase receptor (uPAR) is a founding member of a small protein family with multiple Ly6/uPAR (LU) domains. The motif defining these LU domains contains five plesiotypic disulfide bonds stabilizing its prototypical three-fingered fold having three protruding loops. Notwithstanding the detailed knowledge on structure-function relationships in uPAR, one puzzling enigma remains unexplored. Why does the first LU domain in uPAR (DI) lack one of its consensus disulfide bonds, when the absence of this particular disulfide bond impairs the correct folding of other single LU domain-containing proteins? Here, using a variety of contemporary biophysical methods, we found that reintroducing the two missing half-cystines in uPAR DI caused the spontaneous formation of the corresponding consensus 7-8 LU domain disulfide bond. Importantly, constraints due to this cross-link impaired (i) the binding of uPAR to its primary ligand urokinase and (ii) the flexible interdomain assembly of the three LU domains in uPAR. We conclude that the evolutionary deletion of this particular disulfide bond in uPAR DI may have enabled the assembly of a high-affinity urokinase-binding cavity involving all three LU domains in uPAR. Of note, an analogous neofunctionalization occurred in snake venom α-neurotoxins upon loss of another pair of the plesiotypic LU domain half-cystines. In summary, elimination of the 7-8 consensus disulfide bond in the first LU domain of uPAR did have significant functional and structural consequences.

TidsskriftThe journal of biological chemistry
Udgave nummer18
Sider (fra-til)7403-7418
Antal sider16
StatusUdgivet - 1 jan. 2019

Bibliografisk note

© 2019 Leth et al.

ID: 57150184