TY - JOUR
T1 - Did conversion to thoracotomy during thoracoscopic lobectomy increase post-operative complications and prejudice survival?
T2 - Results of best evidence topic analysis
AU - Fiorelli, Alfonso
AU - Forte, Stefano
AU - Santini, Mario
AU - Petersen, René Horsleben
AU - Fang, Wentao
N1 - © 2022 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
PY - 2022/8
Y1 - 2022/8
N2 - The potential complications related to unplanned conversion to thoracotomy remains a major concern in thoracoscopic lobectomy and may limit the wide adoption of this strategy. We reviewed the literature from 1990 until February 2022, analyzing all papers comparing successful thoracoscopic lobectomy versus converted thoracoscopic lobectomy and/or upfront thoracotomy lobectomy to establish whether unplanned conversion negatively affected outcomes. Thirteen studies provided the most applicable evidence to evaluate this issue. Conversion to thoracotomy was reported to occur in up to 23% of cases (range, 5%-16%). Vascular injury, calcified lymph nodes, and dense adhesions were the most common reasons for conversion. Converted thoracoscopic lobectomy compared to successful thoracoscopic lobectomy was associated with longer operative time and hospital stay in all studies, with higher postoperative complication rates in seven studies, and with higher perioperative mortality rates in four studies. No significant differences were found between converted thoracoscopic lobectomy and upfront thoracotomy lobectomy. Five studies evaluated long-term survival, and in all papers conversion did not prejudice survival. Surgeons should not fear unplanned conversion during thoracoscopic lobectomy, but to avoid unexpected conversion that may negatively impact surgical outcome, a careful selection of patients is recommended-especially for frail patients.
AB - The potential complications related to unplanned conversion to thoracotomy remains a major concern in thoracoscopic lobectomy and may limit the wide adoption of this strategy. We reviewed the literature from 1990 until February 2022, analyzing all papers comparing successful thoracoscopic lobectomy versus converted thoracoscopic lobectomy and/or upfront thoracotomy lobectomy to establish whether unplanned conversion negatively affected outcomes. Thirteen studies provided the most applicable evidence to evaluate this issue. Conversion to thoracotomy was reported to occur in up to 23% of cases (range, 5%-16%). Vascular injury, calcified lymph nodes, and dense adhesions were the most common reasons for conversion. Converted thoracoscopic lobectomy compared to successful thoracoscopic lobectomy was associated with longer operative time and hospital stay in all studies, with higher postoperative complication rates in seven studies, and with higher perioperative mortality rates in four studies. No significant differences were found between converted thoracoscopic lobectomy and upfront thoracotomy lobectomy. Five studies evaluated long-term survival, and in all papers conversion did not prejudice survival. Surgeons should not fear unplanned conversion during thoracoscopic lobectomy, but to avoid unexpected conversion that may negatively impact surgical outcome, a careful selection of patients is recommended-especially for frail patients.
KW - Humans
KW - Lung Neoplasms
KW - Pneumonectomy/adverse effects
KW - Postoperative Complications/etiology
KW - Retrospective Studies
KW - Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted/methods
KW - Thoracotomy/adverse effects
KW - Translocation, Genetic
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85133426982&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/1759-7714.14525
DO - 10.1111/1759-7714.14525
M3 - Review
C2 - 35790080
SN - 1759-7706
VL - 13
SP - 2085
EP - 2099
JO - Thoracic cancer
JF - Thoracic cancer
IS - 15
ER -